Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

898
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
898
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

From early to contemporary normative modeling: Mapping individual differences in neurophysiological signals.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Rotation-tolerant representations elucidate the time-course of high-level object processing.

PloS one·2026
Same author

The effect of hunger and state preferences on the neural processing of food images.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Multiple partially overlapping neural modules orchestrate conflict processing.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The Role of Exposure Time on the Subjective Ratings of Emotional Images in Younger and Older Adults.

Affective science·2026
Same journal

Multimodal correlates of socioemotional movie-watching and their associations with internalizing symptoms in childhood and adulthood.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Emotional Information Recruits Specific Neural Dynamics to Support Hierarchical Cognitive Control.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical systems in the default mode network when reasoning about self and other mental states.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Humanness as Social Normativity: Neural Evidence that Humanized Faces Align with Gender Schemas.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Making new connections: An fNIRS machine learning classification study of inter-brain synchrony in the default mode network.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Attentional Biases in Self-Control Are Associated with Reward Cue-Related Brain Activity.

Social cognitive and affective neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.8K

Neural decoding of competitive decision-making in Rock-Paper-Scissors.

Denise Moerel1, Tijl Grootswagers1,2, Jessica L L Chin1

  • 1The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, 2751, Australia.

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|September 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

In competitive games, players

Keywords:
EEGcompetitiondecision-makingdecodinghyperscanning

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.8K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Game Theory

Background:

  • Social neuroscience traditionally studies isolated brains, limiting understanding of real-time social interactions.
  • Hyperscanning allows simultaneous neural recording from multiple interacting individuals.
  • Research has primarily explored cooperative tasks, with limited investigation into competitive contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate neural dynamics during competitive decision-making using hyperscanning.
  • To examine behavioral and neural strategies in a competitive game context.
  • To understand how previous outcomes influence competitive performance.

Main Methods:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning was employed.
  • 62 participants (31 pairs) played a computerized Rock-Paper-Scissors game.
  • Multivariate decoding analyzed neural representations of decisions and strategies.

Main Results:

  • Participants displayed behavioral biases, deviating from optimal random strategies.
  • Neural representations of decisions and strategies were identified within interacting players' brains.
  • Losers uniquely encoded information from prior trials, potentially impairing performance.

Conclusions:

  • Competitive decision-making is influenced by cognitive biases and past outcomes.
  • Achieving true randomness in strategic interactions is challenging.
  • This study enhances understanding of decision-making and cognitive dynamics in competition.