Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
The Impact of Young Age on Breast Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yongxin Li1, Yuanfang Xin2, Chengrong Zhang1
1Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai, University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, 810000, China.
Insights
Young breast cancer patients face poorer survival outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival, compared to older patients. Despite higher pathological complete response rates, young women experience worse prognoses, highlighting the need for tailored care.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Lack of consensus exists regarding the prognostic impact of young age (≤35 or 40 years) on breast cancer outcomes.
- Young breast cancer (YBC) represents a distinct clinical challenge with potentially different prognostic trajectories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the survival prognosis of young breast cancer patients compared to non-young counterparts.
- To identify specific survival outcomes and pathological response rates associated with YBC.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane) and conference proceedings up to July 2023.
- Included studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or Kaplan-Meier curves for outcomes like overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and pathological complete response (pCR).
- The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023459282).
Main Results:
- This meta-analysis of 129 studies (approx. 1,065,000 patients) revealed significantly worse OS, DFS, breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in YBC patients.
- YBC patients demonstrated higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared to non-young breast cancer (NYBC) patients.
- Subgroup analyses indicated prognostic variations based on molecular subtype, geographic region, and disease stage.
Conclusions:
- Young breast cancer patients exhibit inferior survival outcomes compared to older patients, despite achieving higher pCR rates.
- Prognosis in YBC is influenced by critical factors including molecular subtype, stage, and patient's region.
- Findings emphasize the necessity for early screening, enhanced patient education, and individualized treatment strategies for YBC.
Introduction:
There is no consensus on the impact of young age (≤ 35 or 40) on breast cancer prognosis. In this study, a meta-analysis was carried out on the prognosis of breast cancer in young women.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and key cancer-related international conference proceedings, from their inception to 1st June, 2023, with an update on 15th July, 2023. Studies were included if they reported hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confi-dence intervals (CIs) or presented Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), lo-cal recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathological complete response (pCR). This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023459282).
Results:
The meta-analysis, including 129 studies with approximately 1,065,000 patients, re-ported that young breast cancer (YBC) patients had worse OS (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.17 - 1.43; I² = 93%; P < 0.01), DFS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.47 - 1.70; I² = 68%; P < 0.01), BCSS (HR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1·09 - 1.49; I² = 95%; P < 0.01), LRFS (HR = 2.05; 95% CI: 1.59 - 2.59; I² = 70%; P < 0.01), DDFS (HR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11 - 1.87; I² = 91%; P < 0.01), and PFS (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.16 - 2·03; I² = 90%; P < 0.01) and a greater pCR rates than non-young breast cancer (NYBC) patients (odds ratio (OR) = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16 - 1.82; I² = 87%; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that, compared with NYBC patients, certain differences were found in the prognoses of YBC patients with different molecular subtypes, regions, and stages.
Discussion:
This meta-analysis confirmed that YBC patients have worse survival outcomes than NYBC patients, despite having higher pCR rates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that outcomes varied by molecular subtype, region, and disease stage. These findings underscore the importance of early screening, enhanced patient education, and tailored treatment strategies for YBC patients.
Conclusion:
Patients with YBC had worse OS, DFS, BCSS, LRFS, DDFS, PFS, and greater pCR rates than NYBC patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Absorption

