Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

08:12
Calculating Heart Rate Variability from ECG Data from Youth with Cerebral Palsy During Active Video Game Sessions
Published on: June 5, 2019
20.4K
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Substance Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
David Eddie1,2, Marina Nguyen1, Katherine Zeng1
1Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
JAMA Psychiatry
|October 1, 2025
Summary
Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) significantly reduced negative affect, craving, and alcohol and other drug (AOD) use in adults with substance use disorder (SUD). This wearable technology shows promise for SUD treatment by improving recovery outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Preliminary studies indicate heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) may alleviate craving and negative affect in individuals with substance use disorder (SUD).
- Few studies have investigated the impact of HRVB on actual substance use outcomes.
- No prior research has examined second-generation wearable HRVB technology for SUD treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of second-generation HRVB in reducing negative affect, positive affect, craving, and alcohol and other drug (AOD) use in adults with SUD.
- To evaluate HRVB as a potential intervention for improving recovery outcomes in individuals with SUD.
Main Methods:
- A phase 2 randomized clinical trial involving 120 adults with SUD undergoing 8 weeks of outpatient treatment.
- Participants were randomized to receive HRVB plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU only.
- Ecological momentary assessment was used to measure primary outcomes including negative affect, positive affect, craving, and substance use.
Main Results:
- HRVB was associated with significant reductions in negative affect and craving over 8 weeks, while the control group showed increases.
- Participants in the HRVB group had a significantly lower proportion of AOD use days (64% reduction) compared to controls.
- HRVB mitigated the association between craving and subsequent AOD use, indicating a potential mechanism of action.
Conclusions:
- Second-generation HRVB shows potential as an effective treatment for reducing negative affect, craving, and substance use in individuals with SUD during early recovery.
- HRVB may improve SUD treatment outcomes by disrupting the craving-to-use cycle.
- Further investigation in phase 3 trials is warranted to confirm these findings and establish HRVB as a viable therapeutic option for SUD.

