Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

04:20
A Saline/Bipolar Radiofrequency Energy Device As an Adjunct for Hemostasis in Solid Organ Injury/Trauma
Published on: July 28, 2020
5.6K
Characterizing Industry Payment to Trauma Surgeons Under the Open Payments Program.
Brooks Woodhill1, Joy Ayemoba2, Tanya Zakrison2
1Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
The Journal of Surgical Research
|October 2, 2025
Summary
The Open Payments Program database reveals over $13 million in industry payments to trauma surgeons from 2017-2023. A small number of surgeons received the majority of payments, with Intuitive Surgical as the top industry payer.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Medical Economics
- Surgical Research
Background:
- The U.S. Open Payments Program, established in 2013, mandates transparency regarding financial ties between healthcare providers and industry.
- This initiative aims to mitigate potential bias in clinical decision-making by disclosing financial relationships.
- Understanding these financial flows is crucial for maintaining objectivity in healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and characterize financial payments made by industry to trauma surgeons in the United States.
- To quantify the total amount and distribution of these payments over a defined period.
Main Methods:
- Data was extracted from the Open Payments Program database for physicians identified as trauma surgeons.
- Membership lists from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma were cross-referenced to ensure comprehensive inclusion.
- Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze payment data by surgeon, payment type, industry payer, year, and geographic location.
Main Results:
- A total of 2444 trauma surgeons were identified, with 2205 receiving non-research industry payments.
- Total payments amounted to $13,274,335.85 between 2017 and 2023, with a mean individual payment of $6022.84.
- The top 50 recipients garnered 55.8% of all funds, and Intuitive Surgical was the largest contributing company, accounting for 33.6% of payments. Less than 25% of funds were allocated to educational purposes.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first comprehensive characterization of industry payments directed towards trauma surgeons.
- Further research is warranted to investigate the potential influence of these financial relationships on clinical judgment and decision-making processes in trauma surgery.

