Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation for primary respiratory support in extremely preterm infants:
Yang Li1,2, Xingwang Zhu3, Ling-Jun Li4,5,6,7
1Department of Neonatology, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) is more efficacious than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation as primary respiratory support for extremely preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
Design:
A multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Twenty tertiary neonatal intensive care units in China.
Participants:
342 extremely preterm infants (gestational age between 24 weeks +0 day and 28 weeks +6 days) with respiratory distress syndrome were enrolled in the study between August 2022 and August 2024.
Interventions:
Participants were randomly allocated to receive NCPAP or NHFOV as primary respiratory support for respiratory distress syndrome.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation within 72 hours after birth.
Results:
Treatment failure within 72 hours occurred in 27 of` 170 infants (15.9%) in the NHFOV group and 48 of 172 infants (27.9%) in the NCPAP group (risk difference -12.0 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -20.7 to -3.4; P=0.007). Treatment failure within seven days was also lower in the NHFOV group (-12.5 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -21.9 to -3.2; P=0.008) compared with the NCPAP group. All observed associations remained significant after sensitivity analysis including study sites and antenatal steroid use. No significant differences were found in any other secondary outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusions:
NHFOV appeared superior to NCPAP in reducing the need for intubation when used as a primary respiratory support strategy in extremely preterm infants. Both techniques did not show significant differences in neonatal adverse events.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05141435.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:

