Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Neuro-rehabilitation Approach for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Published on: January 25, 2016
Intratympanic steroid administration and predictors of recovery in sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Devin J Kennedy1, Erin Williams1,2, Lucienna Wolf1
1Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Objectives:
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss patient outcomes remain highly variable despite established treatment modalities. This study investigates the effects of treatment modalities, individual-level risk factors, and clinical presentation on sudden sensorineural hearing loss recovery.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review of n = 231 patients who initiated intratympanic steroids between 01/01/2015-01/01/2025 following sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We collected individual-level risk factors and comprehensive audiometric data. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to identify relationships between patient, disease, and treatment-related variables to audiometric recovery (pure-tone average and word recognition score). Segmented linear regression analysis was used to assess the influence of intratympanic steroid treatment delay on patient recovery. Recovery outcomes were determined in accordance with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery criteria.
Results:
Earlier intratympanic steroid initiation following sudden sensorineural hearing loss symptom onset significantly predicted increased pure-tone average recovery (p < 0.001) irrespective of intratympanic steroid status as primary treatment or as salvage therapy following oral steroids. Intratympanic steroid efficacy significantly diminished if initiated beyond 18 days following symptom onset (p < 0.001). Total number of intratympanic received and time between subsequent intratympanic injections did not impact recovery. Patient-level factors including demographics, socioeconomic status, medical and social risk factors, and medical comorbidities were largely found to have no significant relationship with recovery. Increased initial pure-tone average was associated with poorer overall pure-tone average recovery (p < 0.001). The presence of initial serviceable hearing predicted worse final recovery status (p = 0.01). Bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss showed significantly worse pure-tone average recovery compared to unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (p = 0.04).
Conclusion:
Intratympanic steroids are an effective treatment option for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Clinicians should be mindful of intratympanic steroid initiation timing and case-specific factors that may influence sudden sensorineural hearing loss recovery when treating patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
More Related Videos
09:18A Comparative Study of Drug Delivery Methods Targeted to the Mouse Inner Ear: Bullostomy Versus Transtympanic Injection
Published on: March 8, 2017
06:55A Surgical Procedure for the Administration of Drugs to the Inner Ear in a Non-Human Primate Common Marmoset Callithrix jacchus
Published on: February 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
Several...
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors