Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Exploring radiomic and topological features to evaluate treatment response in rectal cancer
Haozhao Zhang1,2, Jiaqi Liu1,2, Naveen Rajamohan3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States of America.
Abstract:
Objective.This study investigates the potential of topological data analysis (TDA) in conjunction with conventional radiomics applied to longitudinal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, with or without anti-CD40 immunotherapy, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.Approach.Paired pre- and post-treatment MRIs from 21 patients enrolled in the INNATE trial (NCT04130854) were analyzed, including Arm1 (radiation, chemotherapy, and anti-CD40 immunotherapy;n= 12) and Arm2 (radiation and chemotherapy alone;n= 9). Patients were categorized as having a maximal response (MR) or a partial response (PR). Three complementary delta-based analyses were performed: (1) 3D radiomics, (2) 2D radiomics and sliding-windows analysis, and (3) topological feature extraction via TDA. Statistical analysis included cross-arm comparisons (Arm1 vs Arm2), response-based comparisons (MR vs PR), and detailed pairwise subgroup analyses.Main results.For 3D radiomic features, ΔVolume effectively distinguishes between treatment strategies, with Arm1 exhibiting greater tumor reduction compared to Arm2. ΔElongation differentiates between response groups, with MR showing negative values indicative of increased tumor sphericity. In 2D radiomic analysis, Gray-level-dependence -matrix texture features computed across varying sliding windows differentiate between treatment arms but not response groups. Topological analysis identified six features derived from Betti numbers and persistence lifetimes, capturing local heterogeneity in tumor texture, shape and filtration patterns. Among these, five features significantly differentiate response groups, while one distinguishes treatment arms. At a finer level of subgroup comparison, ΔBetti2demonstrates significant differences, distinguishing MR-Arm1 vs PR-Arm1 and MR-Arm1 vs MR-Arm2.Significance.This exploratory study suggests potential of topological features for outcome prediction in rectal cancer. These features may complement standard radiomics to enhance predictive performance as more data becomes available. Notably, the ability of topological features to distinguish maximal responders across treatment arms-with and without immunotherapy-may offer additional biological insights, potentially related to immune-mediated tumor response.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
08:12Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: March 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...