Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

21.0K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.0K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

531
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
531
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.1K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.1K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.8K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing variable selection and model averaging methods for logistic regression.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Open science practices in behavioral addictions: An exploratory survey.

Journal of behavioral addictions·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Movement tracking of psychological processes: A tutorial using mousetrap.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Bayes Factor Tests for Group Differences in Ordinal and Binary Graphical Models.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

Jointly estimating individual and group networks from fMRI data.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Movement tracking of psychological processes: A tutorial using mousetrap.

Behavior research methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.5K

Statistical evidence in psychological networks.

Karoline B S Huth1,2,3,4, Jonas M B Haslbeck5,6, Sara Keetelaar5

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.huth@uva.nl.

Nature Human Behaviour
|October 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Psychometric network models in social sciences often lack robust statistical evidence for reported associations. Researchers should exercise caution when interpreting network findings due to weak or inconclusive data support.

More Related Videos

Soft Pneumatic Robot Modulates Graph Theory Metrics of Brain Network for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke
05:30

Soft Pneumatic Robot Modulates Graph Theory Metrics of Brain Network for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke

Published on: October 10, 2025

420
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.5K
Soft Pneumatic Robot Modulates Graph Theory Metrics of Brain Network for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke
05:30

Soft Pneumatic Robot Modulates Graph Theory Metrics of Brain Network for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke

Published on: October 10, 2025

420
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology and Social Sciences
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Psychometric network models are increasingly used to analyze complex relationships between variables.
  • Interpreting network edges as conditional associations is common, but statistical evidence is often unevaluated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the statistical evidence supporting edges in published psychometric network models.
  • To evaluate the reliability of network findings across a large sample of studies.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of 293 networks from 126 published papers.
  • Application of a Bayesian approach to quantify evidence for each network edge using inclusion Bayes factors (BF10).

Main Results:

  • A significant proportion of network edges were supported by weak or inconclusive evidence.
  • One-third of edges showed inconclusive evidence (1/3 < BF10 < 3), and about half showed weak evidence.
  • Fewer than 20% of edges had strong support (BF10 > 10 or BF10 < 1/10); larger sample sizes correlated with more robust findings.

Conclusions:

  • Many reported psychometric network findings are based on insufficient statistical evidence.
  • Caution is advised when interpreting individual network edges, as results may not be fully supported by the data.
  • Future research should prioritize robust statistical evaluation of network structures.