Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Weighing Open Science Against Research Participation Burden in Informed Consent: A Randomized Pilot Study
Renata Iskander1, Patrick Kane1, Madeleine Sharp2
1Department of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
None:
Deciding to participate in clinical research requires patients to evaluate various trial characteristics. This survey study measured the influence of trial characteristics (visit volume and open data sharing) on willingness to participate in patients with Parkinson's disease. Patients were randomized to either evaluate two trials (joint condition) or a single trial (separate condition). For patients who evaluated both trials, willingness to participate was greater in the restricted science protocol with fewer visits (7.60 vs. 7.12; mean difference, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.14). Patients who evaluated both trials were less willing to participate in the study involving more visits than patients who only evaluated the study involving more visits (7.12 vs. 8.14; mean difference, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.74). Patients have difficulty evaluating information about open science and visit burden when information is presented separately. Although views toward open science were favorable, preferences for fewer visits dominated decisions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Blind Procedures
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...

