Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Three-Dimensional Imaging of Aortic Tissues in Atherosclerosis
Published on: October 25, 2024
Association between atherogenic index of plasma and incident aortic disease: a population-based prospective analysis
Cuihong Tian1,2,3,4,5, Xiao Wang6, Liang Tao6
1Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, China.
Insights
The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is linked to a higher risk of aortic disease, particularly aortic aneurysm. This finding suggests AIP is a valuable tool for assessing aortic disease risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular research
- Lipidology
- Aortic disease research
Background:
- The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a lipid-based biomarker.
- AIP reflects both atherogenic and protective lipoprotein effects on cardiometabolic health.
- The association between AIP and aortic disease risk is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between AIP and the risk of incident aortic disease.
- To determine if AIP can serve as an effective risk assessment tool for aortic diseases.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale, population-based, prospective cohort study using UK Biobank data.
- 17,530 participants aged 40-70 years were analyzed.
- Aortic disease (aortic dissection and aortic aneurysm) was the composite outcome, with a median follow-up of 15.1 years.
Main Results:
- A linear trend was observed between AIP and incident aortic disease risk (p=0.134).
- Elevated AIP tertiles showed a stepwise increase in aortic disease risk (Tertile 3 aHR=2.04).
- The highest AIP tertile was significantly associated with increased aortic aneurysm risk (aHR=2.47).
Conclusions:
- AIP is significantly associated with an increased risk of incident aortic disease.
- AIP demonstrates potential as an effective risk assessment method for aortic disease, especially aortic aneurysm.
Objective:
To clarify whether atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a comprehensive indicator reflecting both the protective and atherogenic effects of lipoproteins on cardiometabolic health, is associated with increased risk of aortic disease.
Design:
Large-scale, population-based, observational, prospective cohort study.
Data Sources:
Health dataset from UK Biobank.
Participants:
A total of 17 530 participants, aged 40-70 years, were enrolled and completed the initial assessment visit before 2010. Participants with a history of aortic dissection (AD) or aortic aneurysm (AA), baseline connective tissue disease, missing triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values, fasting time less than 8 hours or those lost to follow-up were excluded.
Main Outcome Measures:
Aortic disease, a composite outcome comprising AD and AA.
Results:
During a median follow-up period of 15.1 years, 164 aortic disease cases, including 14 AD and 155 AA cases, were documented. A linear trend between AIP and the risk of incident aortic disease was confirmed (p for non-linear=0.134). The multivariable-adjusted incident risk of aortic disease gradually increased with elevated AIP tertiles (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.0 (reference) in tertile 1, aHR 1.48 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.41) in tertile 2, aHR 2.04 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.29) in tertile 3), following an adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, body mass index, hypertension, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin. Specifically, participants in the highest AIP tertile had the highest incident risk of AA, with an aHR of 2.47 (95% CI 1.47 to 4.16).
Conclusions:
AIP is significantly associated with a higher risk of incident aortic disease, indicating that AIP is an effective risk assessment method for aortic disease, especially for AA.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
