Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Prevalence, severity, and modifiable predictors of scanxiety in patients undergoing routine oncologic imaging: a
Mohammad Sibtain Shah1, Jawad Ali Memon2, Uzma Malik3
1Department of Oncology, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences For Women (PUMHSW), Nawabshah, Pakistan.
Background:
Anxiety related to oncologic imaging, "scanxiety," is common and may impair quality of life and adherence to surveillance. However, data on its prevalence, severity, temporal pattern, and modifiable predictors across routine imaging phases remain limited. Identifying modifiable predictors such as communication quality and wait times is essential for developing targeted interventions.
Methods:
This prospective longitudinal study enrolled 406 adult cancer patients undergoing routine CT, MRI, or PET/CT at a tertiary center. Participants completed the HADS-A, STAI-State, and SAA-VAS at the pre-scan, during, and waiting phases, as well as FACT-G, IES-R, and a questionnaire assessing wait times, communication, information, and social support. Data were analyzed using chi-square, Pearson correlations, t-tests, logistic regression, and repeated-measures ANOVA.
Results:
Among 406 patients (mean age 58.4 ± 12.7 years, 57.6 % female), 71.2 % exhibited clinically significant scanxiety, with 60.1 % scoring HADS-A ≥ 8 and a mean SAA-VAS score at the result waiting phase (7.1 ± 2.3). Multivariate analysis identified scan-to-result wait time associated with increased odds (OR 1.19 per day; 95 % CI 1.08-1.31), advanced disease stage (OR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.08-2.93), and prior scans (OR 1.12 per scan; 95 % CI 1.02-1.23) as significant risk factors. Protective factors included procedural explanations (OR 0.46), staff friendliness (OR 0.82), information provision (OR 0.52), and social support (OR 0.57).
Conclusion:
Scanxiety affected over 70 % of patients and escalated across imaging phases, peaking during result waiting. Modifiable factors offer intervention targets to mitigate distress and improve patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
