Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Application of Laparoscopic Ultrasonography in Primary Choledochal Suture during Combined Two-lens Surgery
Published on: March 28, 2025
Evaluating surgical strategies for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts: a multicenter retrospective study and
Chuang Cao1, Zhibin Xu2, Long Cen3
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Insights
This network meta-analysis compared open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgeries for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts (CCC). Robotic surgery reduced hospital stay and bile leakage, while laparoscopic surgery minimized blood loss and bowel obstruction.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Congenital choledochal cysts (CCC) are rare biliary tract malformations requiring surgical intervention.
- Choosing the optimal surgical approach for pediatric CCC remains a clinical challenge.
- Efficacy and safety data for open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgeries are often fragmented.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgeries for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts (CCC).
- To provide evidence-based guidance for surgical decision-making in pediatric CCC management.
- To validate network meta-analysis findings with retrospective cohort data.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines identified 28 cohort studies (3,672 patients).
- Network meta-analysis using a Bayesian model assessed operative time, hospital stay, blood loss, bile leakage, and bowel obstruction.
- Retrospective data from 72 CCC patients (open vs. laparoscopic surgery) were incorporated for consistency validation.
Main Results:
- Open surgery demonstrated the shortest operative time, while robotic-assisted surgery offered the shortest hospital stay.
- Laparoscopic surgery resulted in the least blood loss and lowest bowel obstruction rates.
- Robotic-assisted surgery showed the lowest bile leakage rate; retrospective data confirmed operative time and blood loss differences.
Conclusions:
- Robotic-assisted surgery is associated with reduced hospital stay and bile leakage.
- Laparoscopic surgery is advantageous for minimizing blood loss and bowel obstruction.
- Open surgery is quickest but less favorable for other outcomes, highlighting the need for randomized trials to refine surgical choices.
Objective:
This study compared the efficacy and safety of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted surgeries for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts (CCC) using network meta-analysis, with retrospective cohort data to validate findings.
Methods:
Following the PRISMA guidelines, 28 cohort studies involving a total of 3,672 patients were included. Key outcomes assessed included operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bile leakage rate, and postoperative bowel obstruction rate. A Bayesian model was employed for the network meta-analysis, with heterogeneity and consistency checks as well as publication bias assessments. Furthermore, a retrospective cohort study was conducted on 72 CCC patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and January 2025 at two medical centers [60 cases in the open surgery group [OSG] and 12 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group [LSG]]. These data were incorporated into the meta-analysis to evaluate consistency with prior findings.
Results:
The 28 studies (2007-2025) included two three-arm and 26 two-arm studies. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessment identified biases in selection and follow-up in some studies. Open surgery had the shortest operative time (MD = -1.101 vs. laparoscopic, 95% CI: -1.368 to -0.834; MD = -1.39 vs. robotic, 95% CI: -1.69 to -1.09), followed by robotic-assisted, then laparoscopic surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery had the shortest hospital stay (MD = -1.98 vs. open, 95% CI: -2.72 to -1.19), followed by laparoscopic. Laparoscopic surgery had the least blood loss (MD = 46.76 vs. open, 95% CI: 10.36-83.64), followed by robotic-assisted. Robotic-assisted surgery had the lowest bile leakage rate; laparoscopic had the lowest bowel obstruction rate (OR = 0.11 vs. open, 95% CI: 0.01-0.6). Retrospective data showed OSG had shorter operative time (3.52 ± 0.82 vs. 5.61 ± 1.24 h, P < 0.01), longer hospital stays (15.98 ± 4.99 vs. 12.92 ± 2.15 days, P < 0.05), and greater blood loss (90.45 ± 62.29 vs. 46.00 ± 26.52 ml, P < 0.05) than LSG, with no significant difference in complications. Updated meta-analysis confirmed consistent rankings.
Conclusions:
Robotic-assisted surgery excels in reducing hospital stay and bile leakage, laparoscopic surgery minimizes blood loss and bowel obstruction, while open surgery is fastest but inferior in other outcomes. These findings guide CCC surgical decisions, though randomized trials are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion

