Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Mapping the Binding Site of an Aptamer on ATP Using MicroScale Thermophoresis
Published on: January 7, 2017
Benchmarking Alchemical Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Nucleotide Binding to Multimeric ATPases.
Apoorva Purohit1, Xiaolin Cheng1
1Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, and Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Alchemical relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations accurately predict nucleotide binding in most multimeric ATPases, with accuracy depending on protein structural stability. This study benchmarks RBFE methods for complex protein systems.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry and Biophysics
- Computational Chemistry
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Multimeric ATPases bind nucleotides at interfaces, complicated by cooperative interactions.
- Experimental measurement of binding affinities in these systems is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To benchmark alchemical relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations for nucleotide binding in six classes of multimeric ATPases.
- To assess the impact of substrates (DNA/RNA) and identify limitations of RBFE in complex systems.
Main Methods:
- Large-scale RBFE calculations using fixed-charge force fields across 55 interfacial sites in F1-ATPase, MalK, MCM, Rho, FtsK, and gp16.
- Simulations conducted with and without substrates, requiring extensive sampling (>20 ns) due to ligand properties.
- Structural analysis of protein flexibility and deviations during simulations.
Main Results:
- RBFE reproduced experimental binding preferences for 91% of sites in F1-ATPase, MalK, and MCM, which showed high structural stability.
- Agreement dropped to 60% for Rho, FtsK, and gp16, exhibiting greater structural variability.
- AlphaFold3 modeling of gp16 suggested distinct functional states compared to cryo-EM structures.
Conclusions:
- RBFE methods show significant predictive potential for nucleotide binding in multimeric ATPases.
- Key error sources include structural fidelity, protein flexibility, ligand pose, and alchemical transformation artifacts.
- Computational modeling, including AlphaFold3, can aid in understanding functional states of ATPases.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
09:15Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
Published on: November 21, 2017
Related Concept Videos
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Allosteric Proteins-ATCase
Aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the condensation of L-aspartate and carbamoyl phosphate to N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate. This reaction is the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis. UTP and CTP, the end products of the pyrimidine synthesis...
Arrhenius Plots
The Arrhenius equation can be used...
ATP Driven Pumps I: An Overview
There are four main types of ATP-driven pumps - P-type, V-type, F-type, and ABC transporter. All these pumps are of varying complexities and...
Nuclear Binding Energy