Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Isolation and Cannulation of Cerebral Parenchymal Arterioles
Published on: May 23, 2016
VERMONT: Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Assessment of Stenosis Severity: A Prospective Study
Daniel Akrawi1,2,3,4, Krishna Kadappu1,3, James Xu2,4
1Department of Cardiology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Background:
Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) is an angiogram-based technique validated in early studies; however, data on its real-time diagnostic performance and integration into routine workflow remain limited.
Aims:
The VERMONT study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and time efficiency of real-time vFFR versus conventional wire-based FFR in detecting functionally significant coronary lesions.
Methods:
We conducted a prospective, single-center, blinded study in which vFFR was measured during coronary angiography and compared with simultaneous wire-based FFR. A wire-based FFR of ≤ 0.80 defined a physiologically significant lesion.
Results:
In 209 patients with 225 intermediate lesions, only 20 (8.9%) of lesions were excluded from vFFR analysis. vFFR demonstrated an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96) for detecting lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80, achieving 90% sensitivity, 79% specificity, a negative predictive value of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 74%. Interobserver agreement was excellent (r = 0.97, p < 0.001). Real-time vFFR computation was on average 13.9 min faster than wire-based FFR (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
Real-time vFFR demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance with high sensitivity and NPV for identifying functionally significant intermediate lesions, supporting its use as a reliable screening tool. Importantly, this was achieved with a low exclusion rate, rapid computation time, and minimal interobserver variability, underscoring its practicality in routine clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

