Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

09:01
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
12.2K
Single stage revision ankle arthroplasty, Is it safe?
Parikshit Pekhale1, Shahzad Akhtar1, Sunil Dhar1
1Foot and Ankle Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Summary
Single-staged revision total ankle replacement (rTAR) is a safe and effective option compared to two-stage procedures for patients with low suspicion of infection. Outcomes and complications were similar between the single-staged and two-staged rTAR approaches.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty Research
- Revision Arthroplasty
Background:
- Total ankle replacement (TAR) procedures are increasing, leading to a rise in revision total ankle replacement (rTAR).
- When TAR fails, revision surgery or arthrodesis are options, with revision arthroplasty being preferred in some centers.
- Uncertainty exists regarding the optimal approach for rTAR: single-stage versus two-stage procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of single-stage versus two-stage revision ankle arthroplasty.
- To determine if a single-staged approach increases complications or impairs patient outcomes compared to a two-stage approach.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort study analyzed prospectively collected data of rTAR procedures performed between November 2016 and January 2023.
- Data reviewed included preoperative and intraoperative microbiology, infection rates, tourniquet time, hospital stay, wound complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
- Patients undergoing single-staged rTAR were compared to those undergoing two-staged rTAR.
Main Results:
- Eighty-six rTAR patients (mean age 71.4 years) were included, with 74 single-staged and 14 two-staged procedures.
- No significant difference in infection rates, wound complications, or PROMs was observed between the single-staged and two-staged groups.
- Single-staged procedures had significantly different tourniquet times but no increased complication rate.
Conclusions:
- Single-staged revision ankle arthroplasty is a safe and effective alternative to two-stage procedures for patients with a low index of suspicion for infection.
- The study represents the largest series to date comparing these approaches.
- No significant difference in complications or outcomes was found between single-staged and two-stage revision ankle replacement.

