Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Full vibrational spectroscopy for simultaneous mechanical, structural and chemical analysis.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

3D Bioprinting of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cells: Workflow for Gelatin-Based Bioink Formulation with Hyaluronic Acid and Printability Assessment.

ACS applied bio materials·2026
Same author

Subtype-specific bone mineralization defects and early treatment amelioration in murine models of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis revealed by Raman spectroscopy.

Bone·2026
Same author

Hydroxy-Group Topology as a Molecular Trigger Between Antioxidant and Photosensitizing Properties in Dihydroxynaphthalenes.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Nonequilibrium dynamics of high energy transitions in monolayer WSe<sub>2</sub>.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same author

Ultrafast Excited-State Dynamics of Dithienyltetrazine-Based Donor-Acceptor Copolymers.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Interlinked Macroporous 3D Scaffolds from Microgel Rods
07:32

Interlinked Macroporous 3D Scaffolds from Microgel Rods

Published on: June 16, 2022

2.6K

Engineering macrophage responses through 3D scaffold microarchitecture.

Chiara Martinelli1, Srijan Chakraborty1, Giovanni Buccioli1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Piazza L. da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milan, Italy.

Materials Today. Bio
|October 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tailoring 3D biomaterial scaffold pore sizes influences macrophage responses, balancing inflammation for tissue regeneration and drug screening applications.

Keywords:
3D scaffoldsForeign body reactionImmunomodulationMacrophageTwo-photon polymerization

More Related Videos

A Multi-Cue Bioreactor to Evaluate the Inflammatory and Regenerative Capacity of Biomaterials under Flow and Stretch
07:51

A Multi-Cue Bioreactor to Evaluate the Inflammatory and Regenerative Capacity of Biomaterials under Flow and Stretch

Published on: December 10, 2020

6.0K
A Macrophage-Tumor Spheroid Co-Invasion Assay
09:01

A Macrophage-Tumor Spheroid Co-Invasion Assay

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Interlinked Macroporous 3D Scaffolds from Microgel Rods
07:32

Interlinked Macroporous 3D Scaffolds from Microgel Rods

Published on: June 16, 2022

2.6K
A Multi-Cue Bioreactor to Evaluate the Inflammatory and Regenerative Capacity of Biomaterials under Flow and Stretch
07:51

A Multi-Cue Bioreactor to Evaluate the Inflammatory and Regenerative Capacity of Biomaterials under Flow and Stretch

Published on: December 10, 2020

6.0K
A Macrophage-Tumor Spheroid Co-Invasion Assay
09:01

A Macrophage-Tumor Spheroid Co-Invasion Assay

Published on: January 24, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Immunology
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Biomaterial implantation triggers foreign body reaction, involving macrophage polarization into M1 (pro-inflammatory) or M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes.
  • Controlling macrophage behavior is crucial for tissue regeneration, with growing interest in tailoring biomaterial physical properties.
  • The role of 3D microstructures in modulating macrophage behavior and immune responses remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how 3D scaffold microstructure, specifically pore size, influences macrophage behavior and polarization.
  • To determine if 3D microstructures can be engineered to promote desired immune responses for tissue engineering and drug development.

Main Methods:

  • Fabrication of 3D scaffolds with distinct large (50 × 50 × 20 μm³) and small (15 × 15 × 15 μm³) pores using two-photon polymerization.
  • Assessment of macrophage cytoskeletal organization and metabolic activity in response to the scaffolds.
  • Evaluation of macrophage polarization markers (Arg1 and iNOS) under combined scaffold and chemical stimulation.

Main Results:

  • Both large and small pore scaffolds influenced macrophage cytoskeletal organization and metabolic activity.
  • The scaffolds alone were immunologically inert and did not induce spontaneous macrophage polarization.
  • In combination with chemical stimuli, large pores slightly upregulated anti-inflammatory Arg1, while small pores markedly increased pro-inflammatory iNOS expression.

Conclusions:

  • 3D microstructures offer tunable control over macrophage behavior, distinct from intrinsic material properties.
  • Precisely engineered 3D scaffolds can balance pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotypes.
  • These findings open avenues for 3D scaffolds in *in vivo* tissue engineering to prevent fibrosis and in *in vitro* platforms for anti-inflammatory drug screening.