Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
A systematic review of international performance indicators and metrics relevant to UK general practice
Duncan Chambers1, Rebecca Mawson2, Justina Mettle-Nunoo3
1Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK d.chambers@sheffield.ac.uk.
Background:
A wide variety of performance indicators/metrics are used to measure the performance of healthcare systems and to promote quality improvement (QI). We sought to identify indicators relevant to QI and organisational development (OD) within primary care/general practices and to evaluate the evidence for their use in QI and OD interventions in UK general practice and primary care.
Methods:
We used a framework based on UK National Health Service primary care documents to structure the review. Separate literature searches were performed in four databases to identify relevant reviews and primary studies. Studies were included if (1) the main focus was a metric or indicator that fell within the review framework or (2) they reported an OD or QI initiative or intervention in UK primary care that used one or more of the previously identified metrics or indicators. We mapped studies in group 1 against our framework domains. We performed a narrative synthesis of studies in group 2, again organised by the overall framework.
Results:
We included 28 studies, 24 (11 reviews and 13 international primary studies) for metrics or indicators and 4 for initiatives or interventions. The number of individual indicators or groups of indicators in group 1 studies ranged from 1 to 773. Three of the four UK QI/OD studies focused on initial access to general practice services; the other dealt with a programme to encourage self-care for long-term conditions. Mapping of the group 1 studies identified potentially relevant indicators across all domains but the process was methodologically challenging.
Conclusions:
Although numerous potential indicators exist, they tend to be poorly defined and lack examples of their use in practice. Further work is needed to identify and evaluate candidate indicators.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:

