Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.3K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.5K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.5K
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

56.5K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
56.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Current Understandings and Future Opportunities Related to the Structure Direction in Zeolite Synthesis.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

CRISP: Enhancing ASE Workflows With Advanced Molecular Simulation Post-Processing.

Journal of computational chemistry·2026
Same author

Diffusion of Carbamazepine in Hydrophobic Zeolites: A Comparative Study Using Classical and Machine-Learned Potentials.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

Water Adsorption at Pairs of Proximate Brønsted Acid Sites in Zeolites.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

A machine learning approach for dynamical modelling of Al distributions in zeolites <i>via</i><sup>23</sup>Na/<sup>27</sup>Al solid-state NMR.

Faraday discussions·2024
Same author

A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites.

Nature communications·2024
Same journal

Linking Local Water Electrostatic Potentials to Measured Hydrogen Evolution Onset in Aqueous Electrolytes.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Microsolvation Redirects Electron-Induced Chemistry in Nucleobases.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Interfacial Microenvironment Effects on the Mechanism of Photocatalytic Methanol Conversion for Hydrogen Evolution.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Noncovalent Interactions in Protein-Ti Binding: Titan Bonds at Work.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Partial Phase Remixing of Segregated Mixed Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals Induced by an Instant Change in an External Electric Field.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Pressure-Driven Dissociation of a Kr Clathrate in the Presence of Colloids.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.0K

A Simple and Scalable Kernel Density Approach for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Atomistic Machine Learning.

Daniel Willimetz1, Lukáš Grajciar1

  • 1Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Charles University, Hlavova 8, Praha 2, Prague 12800, Czech Republic.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
|October 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a GPU-accelerated uncertainty quantification framework using kernel density estimation (KDE) to identify unreliable predictions from machine learning models in materials science. The method ensures model trustworthiness by detecting data gaps without retraining complex models.

More Related Videos

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

9.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
06:37

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package

Published on: September 17, 2021

5.0K
An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids
11:03

An Analog Macroscopic Technique for Studying Molecular Hydrodynamic Processes in Dense Gases and Liquids

Published on: December 4, 2017

9.0K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Machine learning (ML) models are vital for predicting material properties and accelerating simulations.
  • Model reliability hinges on the representativeness of training data, posing challenges in high-dimensional spaces.
  • Current methods for uncertainty quantification can be computationally expensive, often requiring model ensembles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a scalable and efficient uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework for ML models in materials science.
  • To provide a model-agnostic metric for assessing prediction trustworthiness.
  • To enable practical deployment and improve the interpretability of ML models in scientific applications.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a GPU-accelerated UQ framework utilizing k-nearest-neighbor kernel density estimation (KDE).
  • Employed principal component analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction in descriptor space.
  • Validated the framework across diverse chemical systems, ML models, descriptors, and material properties.

Main Results:

  • The KDE-based uncertainty score effectively identifies sparsely sampled regions and extrapolative configurations.
  • The UQ metric demonstrates strong correlation with traditional ensemble-based uncertainty measures.
  • The framework successfully highlights areas where ML model predictions are less trustworthy.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed KDE-based UQ framework offers a practical and transferable solution for assessing ML model reliability.
  • It enhances the interpretability and robustness of ML models in materials science.
  • This approach facilitates the deployment readiness of ML models by quantifying prediction uncertainty.