Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

1.4K
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unraveling the economics of pulmonary embolism care in a 23-year resource utilization study.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2026
Same author

Evidence of improvement: A two-decade decline in pulmonary embolism procedural mortality.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders·2026
Same author

Use of intraoperative vancomycin powder and its effects on the incidence of surgical site infection in orthopaedic trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026
Same author

A Sentinel Increase in Mortality Following Nontraumatic Major Lower Extremity Amputation.

JAMA surgery·2025
Same author

Exploring Program Differences in ACGME Milestone 2.0 Ratings in General Surgery: Patient Care and Systems-Based Practice.

Journal of surgical education·2025
Same author

Exploring Program Differences in ACGME Milestone 2.0 Ratings: Interpersonal and Communication Skills and Professionalism.

Journal of surgical education·2025
Same journal

Closing the Feedback Loop: The Feed Protocol for AI-Driven Curricular Reform in Surgical Residency.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

360° Virtual Reality Observation in Neurosurgical Clerkship: A Comparative Study With Surgical Assistant Participation and Conventional Monitor Viewing.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Surgical Case Creation.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

The Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Application and Evaluation of a Formative Feedback Rubric on Nontechnical Skills Using Retrospective SIMPL App Data in General Surgery Residents.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same journal

Sexual Harassment in Operating Theatres and Surgical Environments Among Working Professionals: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Reporting Barriers, and Prevention Strategies.

Journal of surgical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.1K

Investigating Program Differences in ACGME General Surgery Milestone 2.0 Ratings: Medical Knowledge and

Claire Ferguson1, Natasha Becker2, Jonathan Greer3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York.

Journal of Surgical Education
|October 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Program variations significantly impact general surgery resident milestone ratings for medical knowledge and practice-based learning. These variations, potentially due to rating practices, highlight the need for consistent evaluation to reflect individual competency.

Keywords:
feedback and evaluationgeneral surgery traininggraduate medical educationmilestonesresidency trainingsurgical education

More Related Videos

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.0K
Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

4.1K
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.0K
Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Residency Training
  • Competency-Based Assessment

Background:

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone ratings may show significant program-level variation.
  • Understanding this variation is crucial for accurate resident assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate program-level variation in general surgery milestone ratings for medical knowledge (MK) and practice-based learning and improvement (PBLI).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective observational study of 2020-2021 milestone data from 7,581 residents across 328 general surgery programs.
  • Analysis included descriptive statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to quantify program-level variance.
  • Uniform rating practices and program size comparisons were also conducted.

Main Results:

  • Program-level differences accounted for a substantial portion of the variance in MK and PBLI milestone ratings (32.3%–64.8%).
  • Variations most significantly impacted ratings for first-year (PGY1) and final-year (PGY5) residents.
  • Up to 36% of programs used uniform rating practices, with smaller programs more likely to do so.

Conclusions:

  • A significant portion of milestone rating variance is attributable to the residency program, not solely individual resident performance.
  • Inconsistent clinical competency committee (CCC) rating practices may drive these variations.
  • Further research is needed to ensure fair and consistent milestone evaluations that accurately reflect individual resident competency.