Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Analysis of dapagliflozin combination therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and its correlation
Li'na Zhang1, Weixin Dai1, Shuai Zhang2
1Department of Cardiology, Jilin Province FAW General Hospital Changchun 130013, Jilin, China.
Objective:
To investigate the effects of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on myocardial function, inflammatory markers, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 107 hospitalized patients with HFrEF treated at our hospital between November 2022 and October 2024. Based on the treatment regimen, patients were divided into a control group (n = 52), which received standard therapy [diuretics, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and aldosterone antagonists], or into a dapagliflozin group (n = 55), which received dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy. Outcomes assessed included: clinical efficacy; cardiac function [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)]; myocardial work indices [global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE)]; energy metabolism [free fatty acids (FFA) and β-hydroxybutyric acid (β-HB)], inflammatory markers [interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IL-10]; quality of life, and the incidence of cardiovascular and other adverse reactions.
Results:
The dapagliflozin group achieved a significantly higher overall clinical efficacy rate than the control group (94.55% vs. 80.77%; P < 0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, patients receiving dapagliflozin in addition to standard therapy showed significantly greater improvements in multiple cardiac function parameters compared to those receiving standard therapy alone (P < 0.05). GWI, GCW, and GWE were significantly higher, and GWW significantly lower, in the dapagliflozin group (P < 0.05). Indicators of energy metabolism were significantly higher in the dapagliflozin group (P < 0.05). Pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) decreased, whereas the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 increased more markedly in the dapagliflozin group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the dapagliflozin group showed greater improvements across multiple quality-of-life dimensions, and significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular adverse events (14.55% vs. 34.62%) (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of other adverse reactions did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
In patients with HFrEF, the addition of dapagliflozin to standard therapy provides synergistic benefits in improving cardiac function, energy metabolism, and inflammatory status. These effects translate into improved quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes, highlighting dapagliflozin's clinical value in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
