Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Large language models (LLMs) as jurors: Assessing the potential of LLMs in legal contexts
Yongjie Sun1, Angelo Zappalà2, Eleonora Di Maso3
1Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, New York University Shanghai.
Objective:
We explored the potential of large language models (LLMs) in legal decision making by replicating Fraser et al. (2023) mock jury experiment using LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and GPT-o1) as decision makers. We investigated LLMs' reactions to factors that influenced human jurors, including defendant race, social status, number of allegations, and reporting delay in sexual assault cases.
Hypotheses:
We hypothesized that LLMs would show higher consistency than humans, with no explicit but potential implicit biases. We also examined potential mediating factors (race-crime congruence, credibility, black sheep effect) and moderating effects (beliefs about traumatic memory, ease of reporting) explaining LLM decision making.
Method:
Using a 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 factorial design, we manipulated defendant race (Black/White), social status (low/high), number of allegations (one/five), and reporting delay (5/20/35 years), collecting 2,304 responses across conditions. LLMs were prompted to act as jurors, providing probability of guilt assessments (0-100), dichotomous verdicts, and responses to mediator and moderator variables.
Results:
LLMs showed higher average probability of guilt assessments compared with humans (63.56 vs. 58.82) but were more conservative in rendering guilty verdicts (21% vs. 49%). Similar to humans, LLMs demonstrated bias against White defendants and increased guilt attributions with multiple allegations. Unlike humans, who showed minimal effects of reporting delay, LLMs assigned higher guilt probabilities to cases with shorter reporting delays. Mediation analyses revealed that race-crime stereotype congruency and the black sheep effect partially mediated the racial bias effect, whereas perceived memory strength mediated the reporting delay effect.
Conclusions:
Although LLMs may offer more consistent decision making, they are not immune to biases and may interpret certain case factors differently from human jurors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
09:09Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Models, Theories, and Laws
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Language and Cognition
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Components of Language
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...