Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Prevention02:59

Cancer Prevention

6.5K
Several factors can increase the risk of cancer in an individual. About 50% of cancer cases can be prevented by adopting a healthy lifestyle, regular exercise, eating healthy, and following a modest cancer prevention diet. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that populations with vegetable and fruit-rich diets have reduced the incidence of cancer. On the other hand, populations who have a diet rich in animal fat, red meat, junk food, or high calories are predisposed to cancer.
Some...
6.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Engaging Community Oncology Stakeholders to Plan Multi-site Cancer Caregiving Research (CONNECT WF-2300CD).

JNCI cancer spectrum·2026
Same author

Equity Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same author

Sex differences in acute chest pain care in a multisite U.S. emergency department cohort.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Age Differences in Acute Chest Pain Care in a Multisite US Cohort.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same author

Paging the Algorithm: Applying the Best Available Human Principle to Graduate Medical Education.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Scaling what works: a collaborative capacity-building program tailored to optimize resources and scale evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and control.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2026
Same journal

Online Prescribing of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Using AI Disagreement to Expose Gaps in Coverage Rules.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy-Reply.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

WHO Issues Guidelines for Treating Ebola and Marburg Viruses.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

FDA Approves Additional Naloxone Nasal Spray for Opioid Overdose.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.1K

A Direct-to-Patient Digital Health Program for Lung Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

David P Miller1,2, Anna C Snavely3, Ajay Dharod1,2

  • 1Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

JAMA
|October 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A digital health program significantly increased lung cancer screening rates among eligible individuals compared to usual care. This intervention shows promise for improving early detection of lung cancer.

More Related Videos

Anticancer Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Lung Cancer-Targeted Nanoparticles
08:03

Anticancer Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Lung Cancer-Targeted Nanoparticles

Published on: December 1, 2016

9.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

16.1K
Anticancer Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Lung Cancer-Targeted Nanoparticles
08:03

Anticancer Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Lung Cancer-Targeted Nanoparticles

Published on: December 1, 2016

9.4K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Digital Health
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Lung cancer screening via chest computed tomography (CT) reduces mortality in high-risk individuals.
  • Screening rates in the US remain low, with less than 20% of eligible individuals participating.
  • Effective strategies are needed to increase uptake of lung cancer screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a direct-to-patient digital health program in increasing lung cancer screening rates.
  • To compare screening completion rates between a digital health intervention and enhanced usual care.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized clinical trial enrolled 1333 eligible individuals aged 50-77 years.
  • Participants were randomized to either the mPATH-Lung digital health program or enhanced usual care.
  • The primary outcome was chest CT completion within 16 weeks.

Main Results:

  • Chest CT completion was significantly higher in the mPATH-Lung group (24.5%) compared to the control group (17.0%).
  • The odds ratio for CT completion in favor of the intervention was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2-2.1).
  • False-positive results and invasive procedures were low and similar between groups.

Conclusions:

  • A direct-to-patient digital health intervention effectively increased lung cancer screening rates.
  • Digital health strategies hold potential for improving lung cancer screening program reach.
  • Further research is needed to assess effectiveness across diverse populations and settings.