Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

31.9K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
31.9K
Ranks01:02

Ranks

455
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
455
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

244
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
244
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

478
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
478
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.8K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.8K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel maternal prenatal risk index to predict mortality-weighted severe maternal morbidity at hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

Information-Based Composite Likelihood Method for Hybrid Meta-Analysis Integrating Individual Participant Data and Aggregated Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Canopy2: Tumor Phylogeny Inference by Bulk DNA and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Statistics in biosciences·2026
Same author

PD-L1 subpopulations of metastatic urothelial carcinoma demonstrate heterogeneity to chemotherapy: an integrated analysis of digitized trial results.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same author

Mortality-weighted severe maternal morbidity: a novel approach to assessing maternal health outcomes.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2025
Same author

Pair-Feeding Study Designs Can Create Biases and Inflate Type I Error Rates: A Simulation Study.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Bayesian network meta-regression for aggregate ordinal outcomes with imprecise categories.

Yeongjin Gwon1, Ming-Hui Chen2, May Mo3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|October 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel Bayesian statistical method for network meta-regression to compare treatments using aggregate ordinal outcomes. It addresses missing data by modeling unobserved latent counts, improving treatment option evaluation.

Keywords:
Bayesian SUCRADICclinical responsecollapsed Gibbs samplingdirect and indirect comparisonlatent counts

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Direct head-to-head trials for emerging treatments are scarce.
  • Inconsistent outcome measures in placebo-controlled trials hinder treatment comparisons.
  • Aggregate ordinal outcomes offer a potential solution for consistent evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a statistical methodology for network meta-regression with aggregate ordinal outcomes.
  • To address the challenge of unknown response categories in published literature.
  • To enable robust statistical analysis despite missing outcome data.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of unobserved latent counts modeled within a Bayesian framework.
  • Development of a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling algorithm for Bayesian computation.
  • Utilizing information criteria (DIC, WAIC) for goodness-of-fit assessment.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methodology accommodates existing models and handles missing categories.
  • A case study using Crohn's Disease trial data demonstrates the approach's utility.
  • The Bayesian framework allows for a comprehensive analysis of aggregate ordinal outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The novel statistical approach effectively handles aggregate ordinal outcomes in network meta-regression.
  • This methodology improves the evaluation of emerging treatments by addressing data limitations.
  • The Bayesian framework provides a robust tool for analyzing complex clinical trial data, as shown in the Crohn's Disease example.