Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

552
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
552
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

166
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
166
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.8K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.8K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conclusions Are Not Supported by the Published Statistical Analysis. Comment on López-Toledo et al. Flaxseed Improves Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Mexican Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes: A Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial. <i>Nutrients</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 709.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Life-extending interventions do not necessarily result in compression of morbidity: a case example offering a robust statistical approach.

GeroScience·2025
Same author

Initial implicit association between whole grains and taste does not predict consumption of whole grains in low-whole grain consumers: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in nutrition·2024
Same author

Ambiguity in Statistical Analysis Methods and Nonconformity With Prespecified Commitment to Data Sharing in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of medical Internet research·2024
Same author

Examining Demand and Substitutability of Usual Brand Little Cigars/Cigarillos and Cigarettes in Young Adults Who Dual Use.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco·2024
Same author

Social Determinants of Rural Household Food Insecurity under the Taliban Regime.

Nutrients·2023
Same journal

DXA-Measured Visceral Adipose Tissue and Accelerated Biological Aging in Middle-Aged Adults.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Real-World Effectiveness of Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Compared With Bariatric Surgery.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Prospective Association Between Weight Variability and Subsequent Long-Term Weight Loss in the CALERIE Study.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Dietary Protein Reduction During Isocaloric Conditions Reduces Body Weight in Men With Overweight or Obesity.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

Six- and Twelve-Month Changes in Body Composition and 24-h Energy Expenditure After a Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same journal

SURMOUNT-REAL UK: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide in Adults With Obesity.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.9K

Pair-Feeding Study Designs Can Create Biases and Inflate Type I Error Rates: A Simulation Study.

Wasiuddin Najam1, Daniel E Kpormegbey1, Deependra K Thapa1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)
|November 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pair-feeding study designs can inflate type I error (T1Er) rates, leading to false positives. Adjusting analyses for food intake is crucial to mitigate this bias and ensure accurate results.

Keywords:
biasdata analysispair‐feedingrigorstatistical sciencestudy designtype one error

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.9K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
10:50

Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies

Published on: November 8, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Experimental Design
  • Animal Research

Background:

  • Pair-feeding is a common experimental design to isolate treatment effects from food intake variations.
  • Investigators often overlook the statistical implications of pair-feeding, assuming equivalent food intake.
  • The impact of pair-feeding on type I error rates (T1Er) has not been previously quantified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the impact of pair-feeding on type I error rates in experimental studies.
  • To evaluate whether pair-feeding designs inflate statistical significance when food intake is not accounted for.
  • To determine methods for mitigating inflated type I error rates associated with pair-feeding.

Main Methods:

  • Monte Carlo simulations were employed to model animal weight and food intake.
  • Animals were randomized into pair-fed and non-pair-fed groups.
  • Pair-feeding involved truncating food intake to match non-pair-fed controls (individually or by group average); analyses were conducted with and without adjustment for food intake.

Main Results:

  • Both individual and group pair-feeding significantly inflated type I error rates in unadjusted models, with rates ranging from 0.12 to 0.71.
  • Statistical adjustment for food intake effectively reduced type I error rates to approximately 0.05.
  • Unadjusted analyses in pair-feeding studies are prone to false positive findings.

Conclusions:

  • Pair-feeding study designs, when unadjusted for food intake, can lead to inflated type I error rates.
  • Adjusting statistical analyses for actual food intake is essential to correct for inflation and maintain accurate error rates.
  • This study highlights the importance of careful statistical analysis in pair-feeding experiments to ensure the validity of treatment effect conclusions.