Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR
Published on: January 16, 2016
Evaluation of a sample-to-answer real-time PCR assay for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid
Grace Perkins1, Jennifer Swink2, Kevin Wade2
1Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract:
Enteroviruses frequently cause aseptic meningitis, necessitating differentiation from bacterial meningitis to avoid unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and improve patient management. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) remains the gold standard for enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to its high sensitivity and rapid turnaround time. The discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay has created a gap in diagnostics. This study aimed to optimize two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays using Diasorin direct amplification disc (DAD) and universal disc (UD) methods compared to the previously standard Cepheid Xpert EV assay. A total of 87 clinical CSF specimens were tested to assess sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance. There was no significant difference between the performance of the three assays compared to standard of care results. The Xpert EV and DAD methods had a 79.6% positive agreement, while the UD method had an 86.4% positive agreement. All methods achieved 100% negative agreement. Specificity testing against non-enteroviral pathogens confirmed no cross-reactivity. The estimated limit of detection was 100 copies/mL for Xpert EV, 250 copies/mL for UD, and 1,000 copies/mL for DAD, though clinical sensitivity remained high. Blood contamination affected the DAD assay but not the UD method due to its RNA extraction step. This study demonstrates the potential of DAD and UD methods as viable alternatives for rapid enterovirus detection in CSF, essential for patient management following the discontinuation of the Xpert EV assay. Further validation and comparison are needed for broader clinical applications.IMPORTANCERapid and accurate detection of enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid is crucial for patient management in cases of aseptic meningitis, especially following the discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay. This study evaluates two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays utilizing Diasorin direct amplification disc and universal disc methods, demonstrating their potential as viable alternatives for enterovirus detection with high sensitivity and specificity.
Insights
Two new real-time PCR assays using Diasorin discs offer viable alternatives for detecting enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid, crucial for managing aseptic meningitis after the Xpert EV assay
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Virology
Background:
- Enteroviruses are a common cause of aseptic meningitis, requiring accurate diagnosis to differentiate from bacterial meningitis.
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for detecting enteroviruses in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) due to its sensitivity and speed.
- The discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay has created a need for alternative diagnostic methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To optimize and evaluate two laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays using Diasorin direct amplification disc (DAD) and universal disc (UD) methods.
- To compare the performance of these new assays against the discontinued Cepheid Xpert EV assay for enterovirus detection in CSF.
- To assess the clinical utility of DAD and UD methods as replacements for the Xpert EV assay.
Main Methods:
- Real-time PCR assays were developed using Diasorin DAD and UD platforms.
- Eighty-seven clinical CSF specimens were tested using the DAD, UD, and the original Xpert EV assays.
- Assay performance was evaluated based on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative agreement, and limit of detection.
Main Results:
- All three assays demonstrated high specificity with 100% negative agreement against non-enteroviral pathogens.
- The UD method showed the highest positive agreement (86.4%) compared to Xpert EV and DAD (79.6%).
- Blood contamination impacted the DAD assay but not the UD method, highlighting the advantage of its RNA extraction step.
Conclusions:
- The Diasorin DAD and UD real-time PCR assays are effective and viable alternatives for rapid enterovirus detection in CSF.
- These assays can help fill the diagnostic gap created by the discontinuation of the Cepheid Xpert EV assay.
- Further validation is recommended for broader clinical implementation of these alternative diagnostic methods.
More Related Videos
11:09EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. II. Total Culturable Virus Assay
Published on: September 11, 2016
15:16Detection and Genogrouping of Noroviruses from Children's Stools By Taqman One-step RT-PCR
Published on: July 22, 2012