Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Quantitative Static and Dynamic Assessment of Balance Control in Stroke Patients
Published on: May 17, 2020
Ongoing Revision of Balance Dysfunction Diagnoses: Pilot Survey of Clinical Physical Therapists
Lois D Hedman1, Kathleen M Gill-Body, Laura Plummer
1Department of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences (DPTHMS), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (NUFSM), Chicago, Illinois (L.D.H.); Department of Rehabilitation Services, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts (K.M.G.-B.); Department of Physical Therapy, Dean School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard, Boston, Massachusetts (L.P.); Neurologic Rehabilitation, OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (L.W.); Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (SRALab), Chicago, Illinois (L.D.); Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (SRALab), Chicago, Illinois (L.D.); University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado (L.K.); and University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Neurology University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz, Aurora, Colorado (L.K.).
Background And Purpose:
The American Physical Therapy Association's (APTA) vision of transforming society by optimizing movement to improve the human experience must include a reduction in the unwarranted variation in physical therapist practice. The APTA proposed that the profession adopt the movement system as a basis for developing diagnoses to classify movement dysfunction so that treatment is more consistent and specific. In 2021, the Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy Movement System Diagnosis Task Force developed 10 movement system diagnoses for balance dysfunction, a diagnostic process, and recommended intervention strategies. The purpose of this special interest paper is to report on the ongoing refinement of the balance diagnoses and the diagnostic process based on a pilot survey of practicing clinicians and colleagues' informal feedback.
Summary Of Key Points:
Pilot survey participants largely agreed on the clarity of the definitions, the accuracy of the key movement observations, and appropriateness of the key findings from tests and measures, but not the mutual exclusivity of the balance diagnoses. Using an iterative process, the authors considered the feedback to arrive at a consensus to address these concerns. The result is an updated set of 12 balance diagnoses, revision of some key definitions, a refined diagnostic process, and an updated summary of the evidence for task-specific balance-related interventions. These updated diagnoses and diagnostic processes must be examined for mutual exclusivity, validity, and reliability prior to clinical adoption.
Recommendations For Clinical Practice:
Until the balance diagnoses are shown to be mutually exclusive, valid, and reliable, we recommend that clinicians conceptualize balance control dysfunction using the well-established postural control strategies and apply well-supported principles of task-specific interventions when managing individuals with balance dysfunction.

