Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Advancing experimental models of complex decision environments to better understand risky behaviors
Sonia G Ruiz1, Ifat Levy1, Arielle Baskin-Sommers1
1Department of Psychology, Yale University.
None:
This article discusses the experimental models of complex decision environments to better understand risky behaviors. Risky behaviors-such as substance misuse, aggression, and rule breaking-span many clinical conditions, including attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, antisocial personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. A robust body of research indicates that these behaviors are often rooted in impairments in decision making. This conclusion is supported by experimental research that estimates how people evaluate and respond to information. Experimental methods are particularly powerful because they enable researchers to observe decision making as it unfolds in real time, while also providing precise control over aspects of the decision environment that shape behavior. Despite these strengths, the experimental tasks traditionally used to study decision making as it relates to risky behavior have remained relatively static over the past three decades. The authors argue for developing innovative experimental tasks that better capture the complex real-world environments where risky decisions occur and their implications for clinical conditions. The authors highlight the initial steps for capturing conditions where momentary decisions are embedded within context. This work still needs to be extended to the study of risky behaviors relevant to clinical conditions. By more richly representing the landscape of decision making, one may better understand which environments promote, or even discourage, risky behaviors across clinical populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Reason and Intuition
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

