Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.9K
1.9K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.1K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.1K
Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins01:03

Single-Strand DNA Binding Proteins

16.5K
For successful DNA replication, the unwinding of double-stranded DNA must be accompanied by stabilization and protection of the separated single strands of the DNA. This crucial task is performed by single-strand DNA-binding (SSB) proteins. They bind to the DNA in a sequence-independent manner, which means that the nitrogenous bases of the DNA need not be present in a specific order for binding of SSB proteins to it. The binding of SSB proteins straightens single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and makes...
16.5K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.5K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.5K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.9K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
32.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural Basis of a Novel Heme Binding Bacterial One-Component Switch.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Viral transcriptional regulators extensively rewire host pathways through diverse mechanisms.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Chromatin accessibility variation provides insights into missing regulation underlying immune-mediated diseases.

eLife·2025
Same author

Beyond the gene: decoding alternative isoforms.

Trends in genetics : TIG·2025
Same author

Detecting transcription factor binding sites with PADIT-seq.

Nature reviews. Genetics·2025
Same author

Missense variants in human forkhead transcription factors reveal determinants of forkhead DNA bispecificity.

Cell reports·2025
Same journal

Tomogram exploration through template matching and deep learning.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

A comparative review of cryo-electron ptychography: Biological applications and future perspectives.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

9.2K

TF paralogs-Natural experiments in DNA binding.

Shubham Khetan1, Martha L Bulyk2

  • 1Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|October 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Transcription factor (TF) paralogs evolve distinct functions despite similar DNA-binding domains. Sequence variations and differential binding site preferences dictate TF genomic occupancy and regulatory roles.

More Related Videos

DNA Sequence Recognition by DNA Primase Using High-Throughput Primase Profiling
08:04

DNA Sequence Recognition by DNA Primase Using High-Throughput Primase Profiling

Published on: October 8, 2019

9.1K
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

9.2K
DNA Sequence Recognition by DNA Primase Using High-Throughput Primase Profiling
08:04

DNA Sequence Recognition by DNA Primase Using High-Throughput Primase Profiling

Published on: October 8, 2019

9.1K
Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
11:35

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA

Published on: August 21, 2016

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Transcription factors (TFs) are crucial regulators of gene expression.
  • Paralogous TFs, sharing similar DNA-binding domains, exhibit diverse regulatory functions.
  • Understanding the mechanisms behind TF functional diversification is key to deciphering gene regulation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review how sequence variations in transcription factor paralogs lead to functional diversity.
  • To explore allosteric modulation of DNA-binding specificity by distant mutations.
  • To discuss the role of competitive binding dynamics and low-affinity binding sites in TF genomic occupancy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on studies of transcription factor paralogs.
  • Analysis of sequence variations and their impact on DNA-binding specificity.
  • Examination of competitive binding dynamics and TF-DNA interaction models.

Main Results:

  • Sequence variations, even distal to the DNA interface, can allosterically alter TF binding specificity.
  • Co-expression of paralogs leads to complex competitive binding dynamics.
  • TFs recognize a wide range of lower-affinity binding sites, contributing to paralog-specific binding patterns.
  • Differential preference for these sites determines TF genomic occupancy.

Conclusions:

  • Paralogous TFs achieve functional diversity through subtle sequence differences and varied binding site preferences.
  • Understanding these mechanisms is vital for interpreting the effects of genetic variations on gene regulation and disease.
  • This knowledge aids in predicting TF-DNA interactions and their functional consequences.