Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Infection following inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a real-world comparison of device selection and patient
Vi Nguyen1, Ryoko Sato2, Sirikan Rojanasarot2
1Hillcrest Medical Center, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Background:
Advancements in device design have reduced infectious complications following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. This study evaluated infection rates among two models of IPP devices available in the United States, AMS 700™ and Titan®, using real-world data.
Methods:
Patients aged ≥18 years from the Premier PINC AI™ Healthcare Database who underwent IPP insertion with either AMS 700 or Titan between 2016 and 2022 were included. Twelve published risk factors for IPP infection [age >75 years, smoking, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), diabetes, pelvic radiation, urinary diversion, spinal cord injury, obesity, concomitant circumcision, and Peyronie's disease] were used to characterize patients. The association between device model and infection rates was assessed with Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results:
In total, 3,636 AMS 700 and 2,830 Titan patients were identified; 26.9% of AMS 700 patients had ≥1 risk factor compared to 19.2% of Titan patients (P<0.001). Patients in the AMS 700 group had higher rates of type 2 diabetes (10.7% vs. 6.0%, P<0.001), obesity (5.6% vs. 2.9%, P<0.001), and Peyronie's disease (2.3% vs. 1.6%, P=0.04). Infection rates were 1.8% (AMS 700) vs. 2.9% (Titan) at 180 days post-IPP and 2.5% (AMS 700) vs. 3.3% (Titan) at a median follow-up of 3 years (P=0.047).
Conclusions:
AMS 700 patients experienced significantly lower infection rates in both the short- and long-term period post IPP implantation compared to Titan patients, despite having a higher prevalence of known risk factors for IPP infection. These findings suggest that other factors, including device selection, may influence device infection beyond intrinsic patient characteristics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications

