Evaluating human-in-the-loop strategies for artificial intelligence-enabled translation of patient discharge...

Machine translation supported by artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance linguistically-concordant care for patients speaking languages other than English. This assessment of free-text inpatient discharge instructions in Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, simplified Chinese, Somali, and Spanish compared linguist, clinician, and family caregiver evaluations of translations generated by (1) ChatGPT-4o, (2) professional linguists, and (3) human-in-the-loop (AI-generated, professional linguist post-edited). Likert scales (1-5; higher is better) evaluated linguistic and clinical characteristics of each translation. ChatGPT-4o exhibited variable performance relative to professional translations, with poorest ratings for digitally underrepresented languages (Armenian and Somali). Conversely, human-in-the-loop translations achieved comparable, often better, outcomes to professional translations for all languages, (e.g., Armenian mean overall quality: 3.9 [95% CI 3.7-4.2] vs. professional 3.6 [3.4-3.9], p = 0.01), were most frequently preferred (46.5% vs. 28.4%) and had shorter mean translation time (7.1 [5.4-8.8] vs. 16.8 [13.7-19.9] min, p < 0.001). Human-in-the-loop strategies may enable safe, efficient, equitable machine translation application in clinical practice.