Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

04:57
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
10.7K
Evaluating the Gail Model: Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Melissa Rangel1, Shirlene Paul1, Dipti Gupta1
1Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|October 26, 2025
Summary
The Gail Model underestimates breast cancer risk for Black women. Despite similar diagnosis rates, Black women are less likely to be classified as high-risk (HR) by the model compared to White women.
Area of Science:
- Medical informatics
- Public health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- The Gail Model, a breast cancer risk assessment tool, was initially developed on data from predominantly White women.
- Despite recalibrations with diverse populations, concerns persist about underestimating breast cancer risk in certain racial groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the Gail Model in classifying breast cancer risk across different racial groups.
- To identify potential racial disparities in high-risk (HR) classification.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study analyzed electronic medical records of 31,256 women aged 25-75 who underwent mammograms.
- The cohort comprised diverse racial groups: 11,589 Black/African American, 11,008 White, 5,872 Hispanic/Latino, 1,429 Asian, and 1,358 other.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in high-risk (HR) classification were observed across racial groups.
- White women had the highest HR classification rate (11.4%).
- Black women had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR = 0.23) for HR classification compared to White women, even after controlling for other variables. Breast cancer diagnosis rates were similar between Black (1.57%) and White (1.6%) women.
Conclusions:
- The Gail Model demonstrates racial disparity in high-risk classification.
- Black women are less likely to be identified as high-risk, despite comparable cancer incidence rates to White women.
- This highlights potential limitations of race-based variables in risk assessment algorithms.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
624
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
624
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
525
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
525
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
375
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
375
Relative Risk
1.7K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
1.7K

