Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Neuroradiology Publication Metrics by Rank: Current Status
Norman J Beauchamp1, Mahla Radmard1, Caline Azzi1
1From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (N.J.B., M.R., C.A., D.M.Y., R.N.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, Maryland.
Background And Purpose:
Academic promotion criteria across US medical schools vary substantially; however, manuscript production, citations, and the h-index remain some of the most widely accepted, quantifiable yardsticks of scholarly productivity. Neuroradiology lacks published national scholarship benchmarks, which permit faculty self-assessment and appraisal of promotion eligibility within and across academic institutions. We sought to provide such metrics for academic neuroradiologists.
Materials And Methods:
We performed a cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of academic neuroradiology faculty in the US using Scopus data between July and August 2025. Faculty rosters were identified via Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-listed fellowship programs and departmental websites and confirmed with program directors. Academic rank, sex, publications, citations, and h-indices were collected. Individuals without Scopus records were excluded. Descriptive statistics, percentile distributions, and comparisons across academic ranks were calculated, providing standardized measures of productivity for assistant, associate, and full professor neuroradiology cohorts nationally.
Results:
Of 1200 neuroradiologists identified, 1190 with complete rank data were analyzed across 94 academic institutions. Scholarly output rose significantly with rank. Median citations increased from 105 (assistant) to 555.5 (associate) and 2702 (full professor). Median publications rose from 8 to 30 to 89, while h-index values increased from 4 to 11 to 27. Sex differences were minimal at junior ranks but emerged at the full professor level for papers only (median 92 in men and 75.5 in women, P = .04). Percentile values were provided at each academic rank.
Conclusions:
This national analysis provides bibliometrics for academic productivity in neuroradiology, demonstrating progressive increases in publications, citations, and h-indices across faculty ranks. While substantial variability exists, these percentile-based metrics provide neuroradiologists a reference for self-assessment, departmental evaluation, and promotion justification.
More Related Videos
07:50Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
10:24Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
Published on: May 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ranks
Magnetic Resonance Imaging