Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
Validation and reliability testing of the Swedish version of the BREAST-Q reconstruction
Christian Jepsen1,2, Anna Paganini3,4,5, Emma Hansson6,4
1Department of Plastic Surgery Sahlgrenska University Hospital Röda Stråket 12 SE-413 45 Gothenburg Sweden.
Purpose:
This study validates and assesses the reliability of the Swedish version of the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module, a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to evaluate satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after breast reconstruction.
Methods:
This observational study included 300 patients undergoing breast reconstruction at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The psychometric evaluation involved content validity through cognitive interviews, internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability, convergent validity (comparison with the EORTC QLQ-BRECON 23), responsiveness (Wilcoxon rank test), and analysis of floor and ceiling effects. BREAST-Q version 1.0 was used to maintain item richness and comparability with historical data.
Results:
Content validity was confirmed through interviews. Internal consistency was acceptable across all domains (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.95). Test-retest reliability showed good agreement on the group level. Moderate correlations with BRECON-23 supported convergent validity. Responsiveness was demonstrated with significant improvements across all domains postoperatively (mean difference = 20.3, p < 0.001). Ceiling effects were observed preoperatively in Physical Well-being abdomen (40.1%) and postoperatively in four domains, notably Physical Well-being chest (45.5%). These effects may reflect true clinical success but also suggest limited sensitivity in high-functioning populations.
Conclusion:
The Swedish BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module demonstrates good validity, reliability, and responsiveness. However, ceiling effects in several domains highlight limitations in detecting subtle differences among patients with high levels of satisfaction, suggesting a need for stratified analysis and potential refinement of the scale.
Preregistration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05233891 and NCT04714463.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Test for Homogeneity
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Vebe Test
To conduct the test, concrete is placed into the slump cone. The concrete is filled in layers and...

