Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

94.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.9K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

356
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
356
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

3.9K
At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
3.9K
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences01:19

Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences

4.6K
Biostatistics involves the application of statistical techniques to scientific research in health-related fields, including biology and public health. These techniques are essential for designing studies, collecting data, and analyzing it to draw meaningful conclusions. Given the complexity of biological processes, particularly in studies involving human subjects, biostatistical methods are crucial for effectively organizing and interpreting data that might otherwise obscure underlying patterns...
4.6K
Primary Healthcare Services01:30

Primary Healthcare Services

1.9K
Primary care promotes wellness and prevents disease. This care includes health promotion, education, protection (such as immunizations), early disease screening, and environmental considerations. Settings providing this type of healthcare include physician offices, public health clinics, school nursing, and community health nursing.
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>In Vivo</i> Activity of Antimicrobial Peptoid Oligomers against HSV-1 in a Mouse Model of Herpes Labialis.

ACS infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Targeting the FtsH protease unmasks a universal vulnerability to antimicrobial peptoids.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Antimicrobial peptoids pass rapidly through bacterial membranes and flocculate ribosomes and DNA: A single-cell fluorescence study.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Effects of Social Prescribing for Older Adults: An Evidence and Gap Map.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Protocol: Long Distance Walking and Psychosocial Health and Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.

Campbell systematic reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K

Addressing Racial and Ethnic Health Equity in Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Guidelines: Overview and

Meera Viswanathan1, Shazia M Siddique2, Nila A Sathe1

  • 1RTI International and RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center (Cochrane US Affiliate), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (M.V., N.A.S., R.A.).

Annals of Internal Medicine
|October 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews can promote health equity by examining outcome disparities and evidence generalizability. This series explores methodological approaches to address racial health equity in evidence synthesis for better health outcomes.

More Related Videos

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

901
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
05:10

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report

Published on: May 30, 2025

901
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Health Equity Studies

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial for clinical guidelines, policy, and research.
  • Evidence synthesis can address health equity by examining outcome disparities and representation.
  • Societal factors contributing to health disparities require investigation within evidence reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview and background for a series on racial and ethnic health equity in systematic reviews.
  • To enhance the utility of systematic reviews in addressing health inequities.
  • To guide end users, particularly guideline developers, on incorporating health equity.

Main Methods:

  • This article introduces a series focusing on racial and ethnic health equity.
  • The series examines current practices of systematic review users (e.g., guideline developers).
  • Methodological approaches for addressing racial health equity are explored.

Main Results:

  • The series addresses what end users have done regarding health equity.
  • It outlines how to methodologically address racial health equity in systematic reviews.
  • It identifies next steps for incorporating health equity into evidence synthesis.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews are vital tools for advancing health equity.
  • Focusing on racial and ethnic health equity enhances review utility.
  • Further methodological development and implementation are needed to address disparities effectively.