Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Integration of Bioinformatics Approaches and Experimental Validations to Understand the Role of Notch Signaling in Ovarian Cancer
Published on: January 12, 2020
Differentially Expressed Genes Identify FIGO Stage II Cervical Cancer Patients with a Higher Risk of Relapse in a
Carolina P S Melo1, Angelo B Melo2, Fábio R Queiroz1
1Laboratory of Translational Research in Oncology, Teaching, Research and Innovation Center, Mario Penna Institute, Belo Horizonte 30380-490, MG, Brazil.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Most studies investigating prognostic biomarkers in cervical cancer (CC) analyze patients irrespective of FIGO stage, potentially masking molecular features that underlie the aggressiveness of some FIGO II tumors. To address this, we investigated differential gene expression in a FIGO II CC cohort to identify a gene signature predictive of progression-free survival (PFS) within five years of treatment initiation. Methods: Tumor samples from 15 CC patients were analyzed using RNA sequencing, bioinformatics, and machine learning to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with prognosis. Findings were validated in an independent CC cohort (n = 174). Results: High expression of B3GALT1 (HR = 5.11), GTF3C2-AS1 (HR = 18.73), and ZKSCAN4 (HR = 5.18) was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrence in our cohort. Elevated expression of these transcripts is also associated with shorter PFS in the external dataset. Notably, GTF3C2-AS1 expression alone was sufficient to classify all fifteen patients into their respective prognostic groups using a decision tree model, achieving 93.3% accuracy in leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). Additional candidates, including RCAN2-DT, MYH9-DT, IGKC, IGHG1, and IGHG3, were associated with PFS in our cohort but could not be externally validated due to a lack of available data. Conclusions: Transcriptomic profiling revealed potential biomarkers that refine prognostic stratification in cervical cancer beyond FIGO staging. Among them, GTF3C2-AS1 consistently emerged as a potential predictor of recurrence risk. Additional candidates, including B3GALT1, ZKSCAN4, and immunoglobulin transcripts, provided complementary insights but require further validation. These preliminary results highlight intra-stage heterogeneity in FIGO II CC and underscore the promise of molecular markers to improve risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer Survival Analysis

