Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Mapping the After-effects of Theta Burst Stimulation on the Human Auditory Cortex with Functional Imaging
Published on: September 12, 2012
Pre-stimulus neural dynamics predict TMS responses: The role of fractal dimension and oscillatory activity
A L Bisogno1, S Moaveninejad2, M Corbetta3
1Department of Neuroscience and Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Background And Objectives:
The brain operates near 'criticality' balancing stability and adaptability for optimal function. Deviations from this state alter brain responses or signal neurological disorders. TMS-EEG is a powerful tool for studying criticality. In this study, we investigate how pre-stimulus features of activity (power) and signal complexity influence the amplitude of stimulus-related TMS evoked potentials (TEPs).
Materials And Methods:
We used a publicly available TMS-EEG dataset from 20 healthy individuals. TMS was applied to the left primary motor area (M1). We analyzed pre-stimulus features to measure power across frequency bands and Higuchi's Fractal Dimension (HFD), a measure of signal complexity. We examined the relationship between pre-stimulus estimated features and post-stimulus TEP amplitude across trials using machine learning.
Results:
Stronger TEPs were measured when pre-stimulus activity contained lower gamma power and higher alpha power. Interestingly, lower pre-stimulus fractal dimension values, reflecting less complex baseline activity, were associated with increased TEP amplitudes. Partial correlation analysis showed that HFD (R = -0.30) was the most influential feature in predicting post-stimulus TEP. Machine learning models provided accurate predictions of post-stimulus TEP using the pre-stimulus EEG features (R2 = 0.6867).
Discussion:
Our findings are consistent with the brain criticality framework highlighting how shifts in pre-stimulus TEP dynamics influence cortical responsiveness. Reduced gamma power and fractal dimension were associated with stronger TEP amplitudes, suggesting that states closer to order optimize responsiveness-conversely, higher gamma power and increased HFD, indicative of chaotic neuronal dynamics, dampened perturbation responses. The opposite effect of alpha power highlights the frequency-specific nuances of criticality, where inhibitory mechanisms may fine-tune responsiveness.

