Multimodal Communication Outcomes for Hispanic Autistic Preschoolers Following Coached Student Clinician and
Cindy Gevarter1, Jaime Branaman1, Jessica Nico1
1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Abstract:
This study examined child outcomes for five minimally verbal (or non-speaking) autistic preschoolers who participated in cascading coaching programs in which naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention (NDBI) techniques were taught to graduate student clinicians and Hispanic caregivers (three who primarily spoke English, and two who spoke Spanish). While prior studies reported on adult participant outcomes, this study analyzed child multimodal communication outcomes, using multiple baselines/probes single case experimental designs across contexts. Neurodiversity-affirming and culturally responsive principles were embedded within the intervention procedures. Following the introduction of a coached NDBI, all five children (three who received the intervention in English and two who received the intervention in Spanish) demonstrated increased use of (a) the total targeted communicative responses and (b) the targeted unprompted communicative responses, across both student clinician-led and caregiver-led play sessions. The Tau-U effect size measures revealed large-to-very large effects across all of the variables. Overall, higher rates of communication responses were observed during student clinician-led sessions than in caregiver-led sessions. Additionally, behavioral coding of the multimodal response forms (e.g., gestures, aided augmentative and alternative communication, signs, vocal words) using the Communication Matrix revealed that the children used a variety of response topographies during the intervention sessions beyond their preferred communication mode (e.g., signs for three participants). Four of the five children used symbolic communication forms consistently across both caregiver and student clinician-led sessions. Importantly, adults' reinforcement of pre-symbolic or less advanced communication forms during the intervention did not inhibit the use of more advanced forms.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
