Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Prognostic Role of Ventricular Pacing Burden in Patients with Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR
Abdullah Orhan Demirtas1, Abdullah Yildirim1, Mukremin Coskun1
1Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, 01230 Adana, Türkiye.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is common, yet the prognostic implications of ventricular pacing (VP) burden remain uncertain. Materials and Methods: We retrospective single-center cohort study included 118 patients undergoing TAVR who required new PPM implantation. Using X-tile analysis, patients were stratified into two groups, VP < 85% and VP ≥ 85%, at 1 month. Baseline characteristics, post-procedural outcomes, echocardiographic parameters, and long-term endpoints were compared. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; the secondary endpoint was a composite of mortality and first heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Results: At 1 month, 73 patients (61.9%) had VP < 85% and 45 (38.1%) had VP ≥ 85%. Baseline demographics were similar, but patients with VP ≥ 85% had higher LVEF (59.4 ± 4.2 vs. 49.4 ± 6.7%, p < 0.001), lower creatinine (0.8 vs. 1.0 mg/dL, p = 0.016), and higher e-GFR (69.6 ± 20.6 vs. 60.4 ± 19.8, p = 0.017). Time to PPM implantation was shorter in the VP ≥ 85% group (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 6.2 ± 2.6 days, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 315 ± 105 days, mortality did not differ between groups (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 0.76-4.31, p = 0.182). However, VP ≥ 85% was associated with a higher incidence of the secondary endpoint (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.21-4.58, p = 0.012). Echocardiographic follow-up revealed lower LVEF and higher e-SPAP at 1 year in the VP ≥ 85% group (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: In TAVR patients requiring PPM, a high VP burden (≥85%) was not associated with increased mortality but predicted a higher risk of HF hospitalization and deterioration in echocardiographic parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

