Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

08:25
Evaluating the Function of the Foot Core System in the Elderly
Published on: March 11, 2022
3.2K
Sex Differences in Foot Arch Structure Affect Postural Control and Energy Flow During Dynamic Tasks
Xuan Liu1, Shu Zhou1, Yan Pan1
1School of Physical Education, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi 435002, China.
Life (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 29, 2025
Summary
Males have stiffer foot arches than females, impacting balance and movement. Females may face higher injury risk due to compensatory postural adjustments.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Human Movement Science
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Investigating sex-based variations in foot arch structure and function.
- Understanding the influence of these differences on postural control and energy dynamics during movement.
- Aiming to enhance sex-specific training, movement analysis, and injury prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine sex differences in foot arch morphology and its relation to postural control.
- To analyze sex-specific energy flow patterns during dynamic tasks like sit-to-stand (STS).
- To provide insights for sex-tailored biomechanical interventions.
Main Methods:
- Assessed foot arch structure in 108 participants (53 males, 55 females).
- Collected motion data using motion capture, force plates, and EMG during STS.
- Calculated joint forces, velocities, center of pressure (COP), center of mass (COM), and segmental net energy.
Main Results:
- Males exhibited higher foot arch stiffness and distinct postural control strategies (e.g., lower COP frequency, COM velocity).
- Males demonstrated greater momentum transfer post-seat-off, while females showed higher thigh joint power pre-seat-off.
- Significant sex differences were observed in segmental power generation and energy flow during STS.
Conclusions:
- Foot arch structure significantly influences postural control and energy transfer between sexes during STS.
- Females' lower arch stiffness necessitates more frequent postural adjustments, potentially increasing knee and ankle mechanical load and injury risk.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering sex-specific biomechanics in movement assessment and injury prevention.

