Nuances in the memory undermining effects of EMDR and imagery rescripting
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Henry Otgaar1, Sanne T L Houben2
1Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Netherlands; Faculty of Law and Criminology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract:
We reviewed the evidence on the memory undermining effects of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and imagery rescripting. Both therapies appear to undermine memory quality by making memories less vivid and emotionally-negative. Also, while eye movements used in EMDR seem to increase spontaneous false memories, they do not increase the susceptibility to suggestion. Inconsistent findings have emerged on the effects of imagery rescripting on false memory generation. Furthermore, a substantial number of clinicians who use EMDR strongly believe in the notion of repressed memory and EMDR has been associated with the occurrence of recovered memories. The belief in repressed memory might encourage suggestive therapeutic techniques, thereby increasing the risk of false memory creation. Overall, nuance is required on potential memory undermining effects of EMDR and imagery rescripting.
Related Concept Videos
Repressed Memory
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Traumatic Memory
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Flashbulb Memory
Elaborative Rehearsals
The effectiveness of...

