Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols
Published on: April 21, 2017
Response surface methodology optimisation of catanionic surfactant mixtures in de-inking packaging plastic waste
Shafeeq Ahmed Syed Ali1, I M S K Ilankoon1, Lian Zhang2
1Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia; Waste and Critical Metals Sustainability Research Group, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia.
This study explored catanionic surfactant mixtures for plastic de-inking, finding cationic-rich mixtures (Mix 2:1) achieved 100% efficiency. Optimized hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is recommended for industrial plastic recycling.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Chemical Engineering
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Printing inks hinder plastic recycling quality and economic viability.
- Single-surfactant systems are conventionally used for plastic de-inking.
- Surfactant mixtures offer potential but remain largely unexplored for de-inking applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of catanionic surfactant mixtures, specifically hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) - sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) systems, for plastic de-inking.
- To optimize de-inking parameters including temperature, pH, and surfactant concentration using response surface methodology.
- To evaluate the performance of different surfactant mixture ratios and compare them with single surfactant systems.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a response surface methodology to optimize temperature (25-55°C), pH (10-12), and surfactant concentration (1-25× CMC).
- Investigated catanionic surfactant mixtures of CTAB and SDS at various ratios.
- Performed kinetic modeling to determine de-inking reaction order and rate constants.
Main Results:
- Cationic-rich mixtures (Mix 2:1) achieved up to 100% de-inking efficiency, comparable to CTAB alone.
- Anionic-rich mixtures (Mix 1:2) demonstrated poor de-inking performance.
- pH was identified as the most significant factor influencing de-inking efficiency, with strong quadratic and interaction effects.
- Pre-heating surfactant solutions increased efficiency by 34.49%.
Conclusions:
- Catanionic surfactant mixtures, particularly cationic-rich formulations, show synergistic potential for effective plastic de-inking.
- Optimized CTAB (25°C, pH 12, 16.5× CMC) is a viable option for industrial-scale de-inking.
- Future research should focus on bio-based surfactants, optimizing solid-liquid ratios, and integrated wastewater treatment for enhanced circular economy initiatives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surface Active Agents
Microbial Bioremediation of Plastics

