Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

548
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
548
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.1K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

478
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
478
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.8K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.8K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

11.9K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
11.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What does a good day look like?: An interpretable machine learning approach to the American Time Use Survey.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report.

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Affect dynamics or response bias? The relationship between extreme response style and affect dynamics in a controlled experiment.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

State-trace analysis meets personality measurement: Why the Big Five tests are not based on five latent dimensions and how to fix them.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The relationship between the phi coefficient and the unidimensionality index H: Improving psychological scaling from the ground up.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

Effects of a digital self-efficacy training in stressed university students: A randomized controlled trial.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Psychometric functions from multiple responses : Dedicated to the memory of Colin L. Mallows.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Low-cost, open-source, full-stack software and Arduino-based hardware for control of commercially available animal behavior systems.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

PyNeon: A Python package for the analysis of Neon multimodal mobile eye-tracking data.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Talking surveys: How photorealistic embodied conversational agents shape response quality, engagement, and satisfaction.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

6.3K

Contrast analysis for competing hypotheses: A tutorial using the R package cofad.

Mirka Henninger1, Simone Malejka2, Johannes Titz3

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. mirka.henninger@unibas.ch.

Behavior Research Methods
|October 30, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Contrast analysis offers a powerful alternative to traditional variance analysis for psychology research. This method allows for direct testing of competing hypotheses, enhancing the understanding of cognitive and behavioral processes.

Keywords:
Competing contrastsContrast analysisExperimental researchHypothesis testingMulti-group analysis

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

6.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) is commonly used in psychology for group comparisons.
  • Contrast analysis presents a valuable, though less recognized, alternative for hypothesis testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the fundamental concepts of contrast analysis for hypothesis testing in psychological research.
  • To introduce and demonstrate the method of directly comparing two competing contrasts.
  • To provide a practical guide for conducting these analyses using R software.

Main Methods:

  • Review of contrast analysis principles for between-subjects and within-subjects designs.
  • Demonstration of competing-contrast analysis.
  • Tutorial on using the R package 'cofad' for analysis.

Main Results:

  • Contrast analysis is effective for testing directional, theoretically motivated hypotheses.
  • Directly testing competing contrasts offers a flexible and powerful approach.
  • The 'cofad' package in R facilitates these analyses.

Conclusions:

  • Competing-contrast analysis is a valuable, hypothesis-driven tool for psychological research.
  • This method enhances the understanding of cognitive and behavioral processes.
  • It provides a straightforward, flexible, and high-powered alternative to traditional methods.