Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
Comparing Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis With Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Koichi Inoue1, Koichi Maeda1, Kyongsun Pak2
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) shows superior left ventricular mass regression compared to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis. This finding is crucial for long-term patient management and treatment selection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling, or mass regression, post-aortic valve replacement is linked to better clinical outcomes in aortic stenosis patients.
- The comparative impact of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on left ventricular mass regression remains incompletely understood.
- This study aimed to directly compare left ventricular mass changes following SAVR and TAVR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of SAVR and TAVR in promoting left ventricular mass regression.
- To evaluate the time course of left ventricular mass changes up to one year post-intervention.
- To identify factors associated with left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1939 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing isolated SAVR or TAVR was analyzed.
- Propensity score matching created a 1:1 matched cohort of 247 pairs for comparison.
- Left ventricular mass regression was assessed using echocardiography up to one year post-procedure.
Main Results:
- SAVR resulted in significantly greater left ventricular mass regression than TAVR at both 30 days (SAVR: -11.2% vs. TAVR: -2.6%) and 1 year (SAVR: -23.8% vs. TAVR: -13.8%).
- Multivariable analysis indicated that higher baseline left ventricular mass index, undergoing SAVR, and absence of moderate or greater paravalvular leakage were associated with improved regression.
- The odds of left ventricular mass regression were significantly higher with SAVR (OR, 2.54) compared to TAVR.
Conclusions:
- Surgical aortic valve replacement demonstrates superior left ventricular mass regression compared to transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a propensity-matched cohort.
- The choice between SAVR and TAVR has significant implications for left ventricular remodeling.
- Optimizing valve selection is critical for the lifetime management of patients with aortic stenosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

