Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
A multi-institution performance assessment of a double-layer MLC.
Andy Buckle1, Conor Heeney2, Matthew Jones3
1Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Radiotherapy Physics, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Multi-institutional testing established typical performance ranges for Varian Halcyon and Ethos linear accelerator (linac) multi-leaf collimator (MLC) systems. Most performance indices align with existing linac data, with minor exceptions noted in proximal layer calibration.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Technology
Background:
- Varian Halcyon and Ethos linear accelerators (linacs) feature a novel double-layer multi-leaf collimator (MLC).
- Understanding the performance characteristics of this new MLC technology is crucial for quality assurance in radiotherapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a multi-institutional evaluation of the MLC performance for Varian Halcyon and Ethos linacs.
- To define the typical range of performance indices for these specific linac models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized plans delivered to a megavoltage (MV) imaging panel for reproducible testing across multiple centers.
- Employed automated image analysis to derive metrics for MLC performance characterization.
- Included tests such as picket fence, MLC leakage, sweeping gap, open field symmetry, output variation with gantry angle, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) indices.
Main Results:
- Performance indices were measured across sixteen linacs from eleven institutions.
- Most performance metrics were found to be consistent with those of other linacs.
- An exception was noted regarding the proximal layer positional calibration.
Conclusions:
- Established typical performance index ranges for the multi-leaf collimators in Varian Halcyon and Ethos linacs.
- Provides a benchmark for quality assurance and performance assessment of these radiotherapy devices.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

