Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Methods to Discover Alternative Promoter Usage and Transcriptional Regulation of Murine Bcrp1
Published on: May 27, 2016
Alternative Promoters Drive Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Prognostic Stratification in TNBC
Simran Jit1,2, Kirti Jain1,2, Leepakshi Dhingra1
1CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), New Delhi, 110025, India.
Abstract:
Pre-transcriptional regulation through alternative promoter usage is a critical yet underexplored mechanism influencing gene expression in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive and heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. While short-read RNA sequencing data are widely available, they offer limited resolution in accurately capturing transcript-level diversity. To overcome this, we focused on promoter-level quantification to infer active promoter usage and investigate transcriptional regulation dynamics in TNBC. Using RNA-seq data from 360 TNBC tumors and 88 adjacent normal tissues, we identified TNBC-specific and subtype-enriched Active Alternative Promoters (AAPs). Integration with H3K4me3 and H3K27ac ChIP-seq data confirmed a key promoter switching event in the HDAC9 gene: the promoter pr1077 was downregulated while another promoter pr1079 was specifically activated in TNBCs. This switch was epigenetically supported by differential enrichment of histone marks, implicating HDAC9 promoter switching as a tumor-specific regulatory mechanism. Further, we identified subtype-specific alternative promoters in TNBC, including basal subtype-enriched activity of SEC31A and reduced promoter usage of AKAP9, which were not reflected at the gene expression level but were evident through promoter-level analysis. Next, we identified alternative promoters of HUWE1 and FTX as independent predictors of relapse-free survival (RFS) in TNBC. Their prognostic value remained significant after adjusting for copy number alterations and transcriptomic subtypes. A 4-feature model integrating these two promoter activities with two clinical variables (Tumor size, Ki67 index) achieved an AUROC of 0.73 and improved patient risk stratification, with a Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 0.40-0.48 over the clinical-only model, underscoring the potential of promoter activity as a biomarker in TNBC.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming

