Semaglutide Use With Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Analyses and Patient-reported Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Melissa-Rosina Pasqua1, Joelle Doumat2, Michael A Tsoukas1
1Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Objectives:
Interest in incretin therapy for type 1 diabetes is increasing, but data are lacking regarding patient-reported outcomes and personal experience among those using this drug.
Methods:
This work is an analysis from a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial assessing semaglutide vs placebo, with automated insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes, after 15-week interventions. The following questionnaires were used after each intervention: the Diabetes Distress Scale; the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey; the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; Insulin-delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations (INSPIRE); and the Diabetes Bowel Symptom Questionnaire (DBSQ). Semistructured interviews were performed at the end of the trial. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by research personnel for themes using an inductive-deductive approach.
Results:
Twenty-three participants completed their questionnaires, whereas 24 performed interviews. For semaglutide vs placebo, only the DBSQ showed differing scores with increased symptom frequency and severity with semaglutide. Within the interviews, 42% of patients expressed interest in semaglutide use outside the study, with their reasons being lower insulin requirements, weight loss, and improved glycemic management. Many of these qualities, including complication risk reduction, were qualities of the ideal adjunctive therapy as per participants. Nausea and fear of vomiting were barriers to accurate preprandial determination of upcoming carbohydrate intake and thus preprandial bolus. Synergy was noted between the drug and automated insulin delivery by the participants.
Conclusions:
Semaglutide is of interest to those with type 1 diabetes. Safe and accurate bolus practice by patients in the context of nausea should be reviewed during dose titration. Questionnaires did not capture differences between semaglutide and placebo outside of increased gastrointestinal side effects.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

