Binaural beats for perioperative anxiety and pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Jialin Xiong1, Xin Jiang1, Binyang Cai1
1Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Background:
Perioperative anxiety has a high prevalence, exacerbating hemodynamic fluctuations and postoperative pain. Compared with conventional music therapy, binaural beats (BB) audio distinctively modulates emotional pathways via cortical entrainment, potentially offering superior anxiolytic and analgesic efficacy in surgical settings.
Objective:
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of BB audio on perioperative anxiety, pain, and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Methods:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to December 2024 were retrieved from MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Studies examining the effects of perioperative BB audio on anxiety, pain, and hemodynamic parameters in surgical patients were included. The primary outcome was anxiety levels (measured by standardized scales). Secondary outcomes included pain, changes in hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate), and incidence of adverse events (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, hearing impairment, etc.).
Results:
Out of 318 studies initially identified, 15 studies were included. Compared to blank audio controls, BB significantly reduced perioperative anxiety (14 trials, n = 1047; SMD = - 1.38, 95 % CI: - 1.89 to - 0.87, P < 0.0001, I² = 91.6 %), postoperative pain (5 trials, n = 433; SMD = - 0.61, 95 % CI: - 1.03 to - 0.19, P = 0.0024, I² = 75.8 %), systolic blood pressure (6 trials, n = 436; MD = - 5.57 mmHg, 95 % CI: - 8.71 to - 2.44, P = 0.3041, I² = 17 %), and heart rate (MD = - 3.37 bpm, 95 % CI: - 5.45 to - 1.29, P = 0.3253, I² = 13.9 %), though effects on diastolic blood pressure were not significant (MD = - 2.33 mmHg, 95 % CI: -5.19 to 0.52, P = 0.0334, I² = 58.7 %). When compared to non-binaural beats (non-BB) audio, BB demonstrated superior reductions in anxiety (8 trials, n = 598; SMD = - 1.01, 95 % CI: - 1.99 to - 0.03, P < 0.0001; I² = 95.4 %) and postoperative pain (3 trials, n = 265; SMD = - 0.52, 95 % CI: - 0.77 to - 0.28, P = 0.9235, I² = 0 %).
Conclusion:
Perioperative BB audio significantly reduces anxiety, alleviates pain, and stabilizes key hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure, heart rate), outperforming non-BB audio. BB audio represents a promising non-pharmacological intervention, though inter-trial heterogeneity was substantial. Protocol standardization requires further high-quality RCTs.
Related Concept Videos
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Analgesia and Pain Management
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Stages of General Anesthesia


