Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Esophageal Heat Transfer for Patient Temperature Control and Targeted Temperature Management
Published on: November 21, 2017
Paediatric Fever Management Practices and Antipyretic Use Among Doctors and Nurses in Australian Emergency
Anastasia Mutic1, Rui Zhi Tan1, Eunicia Tan2,3
1Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Less than 10% of Australian emergency department clinicians follow international guidelines for pediatric fever management. Practice varied significantly between specialist and general departments, with lower adherence in specialist settings.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Care
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- International guidelines exist for managing pediatric fever, focusing on alleviating distress with antipyretic monotherapy.
- Adherence to these guidelines among Australian Emergency Department (ED) clinicians is not well-documented.
- Understanding practice variations is crucial for improving pediatric fever management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the adherence of Australian ED clinicians to international clinical guidelines for pediatric fever management.
- To identify variations in practice between different types of EDs and between medical and nursing staff.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional survey was conducted across 22 Australian EDs.
- Clinical vignettes were used to evaluate compliance with guidelines for treating pediatric fever.
- Respondents included doctors and nurses, with comparisons made between specialist pediatric EDs and general EDs.
Main Results:
- Only 9.3% of 539 surveyed clinicians adhered to evidence-based guidelines for pediatric fever treatment.
- Clinicians in specialist pediatric EDs showed less than half the adherence rate of those in general EDs (5.4% vs. 12.4%).
- Nearly half of respondents (46.8%) endorsed combined antipyretic therapy, and many would use antipyretics for temperature reduction (84.0%) or decreased fluid intake (87.5%).
Conclusions:
- Adherence to international consensus recommendations for pediatric fever management among Australian ED clinicians is low, with fewer than 10% reporting consistent practice.
- Significant variations in practice exist, particularly between specialist pediatric and general EDs.
- Current practices often deviate from evidence-based guidelines, highlighting a need for improved education and implementation strategies.
Objectives:
To examine variation in practice and adherence to international clinical guidelines for the management of fever among Australian Emergency Department (ED) clinicians.
Methods:
Cross-sectional survey across 22 Australian EDs. Clinical vignettes were used to determine compliance with international best practice guidelines (use of antipyretic monotherapy to alleviate fever-associated child distress) for paediatric fever treatment. Comparisons were made between specialist paediatric EDs and general (non-specialist paediatric) EDs, and between medical and nursing staff.
Results:
Of 539 survey respondents (300 doctors, 239 nurses; overall response rate 65.9%), only 9.3% (50/539, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.1%-12.0%) adhered to evidence-based practice guidelines. Specialist paediatric ED clinicians demonstrated less than half the adherence of those from general EDs (5.4% [11/204] vs. 12.4% [38/307], difference -7.0%, 95% CI -11.7% to -1.9%). In a febrile settled child with normal hydration, the proportion of respondents who opted for antipyretics more than doubled in the context of elevated vital signs (40.4% [218/539] vs. 83.1% [44/539], difference -42.7%, 95% CI -46.8% to -38.2%). Nearly half of respondents (239/539, 46.8%, 95% CI 42.4%-51.2%) endorsed giving combined antipyretic therapy. In a febrile settled child, most participants would give antipyretics for temperature reduction (453/539, 84.0%, 95% CI 80.7%-86.9%) and for decreased fluid intake (468/539, 87.5%, 95% CI 84.4%-90.0%). Over one-third (192/539, 36.0%, 95% CI 32.1%-40.2%) recommended using antipyretics for febrile convulsion prevention during the current illness.
Conclusions:
Fewer than 10% of Australian ED clinicians self-report practice consistent with international consensus recommendations for paediatric fever management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever:
Increased Body Temperature
Patterns of Fever
Types of Fever
Here are the different types of fever:
Tonsillitis II: Management
Factors Affecting Body Temperature
Factors may include:

