Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.8K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

237
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
237
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

557
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
557
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

985
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
985
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

566
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
566

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of antidepressant response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in clinical studies of depression.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Genome-wide meta-analysis of quantitatively measured generalized anxiety symptoms in individuals of European ancestry.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Genetics of major depressive disorder in a homogeneous population with uniform phenotyping.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Polygenic scores in sleep research.

Sleep·2026
Same author

umx version 4.5: Extending Twin and Path-Based SEM in R with CLPM, MR-DoC, Definition Variables, Ωnyx Integration, and Censored Distributions.

Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association study of major anxiety disorders in 122,341 European-ancestry cases identifies 58 loci and highlights GABAergic signaling.

Nature genetics·2026
Same journal

Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects on Child ADHD Traits in Early and Mid-Childhood: Trio Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analyses in a Large Norwegian Birth Registry Cohort.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Behavioral Disinhibition Model of Addiction: A Review and New Findings from the Minnesota Twin Family Study.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Tracing the Right Path: Determination of Large Pedigree Segmentation and Relatedness.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Genetic and Environmental Associations Between Processing Speed and Executive Functions Across Adolescence and Established Adulthood.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Heritability of Functional Literacy: Evidence from a Classical Twin Design.

Behavior genetics·2026
Same journal

Geneticists' Understandings of Genetic Causation.

Behavior genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.6K

Measurement Error and Power in Family-Based Extensions to Mendelian Randomization.

Luis F S Castro-de-Araujo1,2, Madhurbain Singh3,4, Yi Daniel Zhou3

  • 1Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1‑156, P.O. Box 980126, Richmond, VA, 23298‑0126, USA. luis.araujo@vcuhealth.org.

Behavior Genetics
|November 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian Randomization (MR) models, including MR-DoC2, are compared for causal inference. MR-DoC2 shows greater robustness against measurement error and environmental confounding than standard DoC or MR-DoC models.

Keywords:
CausalityMendelian randomizationPleiotropyTwin design

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.7K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.6K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.7K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Genetic Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a key method for causal inference in health sciences, utilizing genetic variants as instrumental variables.
  • A core assumption of MR is the exclusion restriction, meaning genetic variants affect the outcome solely through the exposure, with no horizontal pleiotropy.
  • Extensions like MR-DoC and MR-DoC2 have been developed to address violations of this assumption, particularly horizontal pleiotropy and bidirectional causation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of Direction of Causation (DoC), MR-DoC, and MR-DoC2 models.
  • To evaluate the impact of phenotypic measurement error and unshared environmental confounding on these models.
  • To assess statistical power differences across the three causal inference models.

Main Methods:

  • The study involved a comparative analysis of three causal inference models: DoC, MR-DoC, and MR-DoC2.
  • Performance was evaluated under varying conditions of phenotypic measurement error and unshared environmental confounding.
  • Statistical power was assessed across the different model configurations.

Main Results:

  • MR-DoC2 demonstrated superior performance, exhibiting less vulnerability to phenotypic measurement error compared to standard DoC and MR-DoC.
  • Standard DoC and MR-DoC models yielded biased causal path estimates when unshared environmental covariance between exposure and outcome was assumed to be absent.
  • MR-DoC2 offers improved reliability in causal inference, especially when measurement error is a concern.

Conclusions:

  • MR-DoC2 is a more robust model for causal inference than DoC and MR-DoC, particularly in the presence of measurement error.
  • The findings highlight the importance of considering measurement error and environmental factors when applying MR methods.
  • MR-DoC2 provides a valuable extension for more accurate causal effect estimation in genetic epidemiology.