Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Required withdrawal times to meet adenoma detection targets during colonoscopy
Mahsa Taghiakbari1, Sara-Ivana Calce2, Douglas K Rex3
1University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Background And Aims:
Physicians with baseline adenoma detection rates (ADRs) less than 26% who improve their ADR can reduce patients' risk of postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. We investigated the average corrected withdrawal time (cWT) required for low-performers (<25% baseline ADR) to achieve an ADR of at least 26%.
Methods:
This prospective study used full-length video recordings of elective colonoscopies to determine cWT, ie, withdrawal time adjusted by subtracting the duration of interventions, to better represent mucosal inspection time. The primary outcome was the average cWT required for low performers to achieve an ADR ≥26%. Secondary outcomes included the cWT required for high performers to reach ADR ≥26%, and for both groups to achieve ADR ≥35%. In addition, absolute and incremental increases in ADR, advanced ADR, sessile serrated lesion detection rate, polyp detection rate, polyp and adenomas per colonoscopy per additional cWT, and overall withdrawal time (WT) minute were assessed.
Results:
In total, 1072 colonoscopies performed by 15 endoscopists were included. Low performers required about 11 minutes of cWT to reach an ADR ≥26% and 11 minutes longer than high performers to achieve ADR ≥35% (2'59″ vs 14'08″). Each additional cWT minute increased adenoma detection odds by 7.1% overall (5.2% for high performers, 15.0% for low performers; P < .001). Absolute ADR gains per cWT minute were 1.1% to 1.3% for high performers and 1.2% to 3.4% for low performers. All detection metrics significantly increased with longer cWT and overall WT.
Conclusions:
Longer cWT improves detection across all metrics, with the greatest benefit for low performers. These results support implementation of individualized WT recommendations on the basis of baseline endoscopist performance rather than a universal time threshold.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

